EE Limited and Hutchinson 3G UK Limited v David Paul Stephenson & Anor [2021] UKUT 167 (LC)

[2021] UKUT 167 (LC)
UPPER TRIBUNAL (LANDS CHAMBER)
DAVID PAUL STEPHENSONRespondentsAP WIRELESS ii (UK) LIMITEDRespondent
UTLC Case Numbers: LC-2020-25
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS CODE – jurisdiction – termination and new agreement or modification of subsisting agreement – whether operator must plead site specific reason for new agreement – whether applicant can claim alternative relief not preceded by notice proposing change
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
Re: Land at Pendown Farm, Pendown Cross,Cornwall, TR4 9NEBefore: The President, Mr Justice FancourtThe Rolls BuildingHearing: 27 May 2021Mr Graham Read QC and Mr James Tipler for ClaimantsMr Christopher Pymont QC and Mr Wayne Clark for Respondents© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021The following cases are referred to in this decision:EE Limited / Hutchison 3G Limited v Duncan[2021] CSIH 27O’May v City of London Real Property Co Ltd[1983] 2 A.C.736Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Ashloch Limited[2021] EWCA Civ 90Jenkin R Lewis & Sons v Kerman[1971] Ch 477, 496Cairnplace Ltd v CBL (Property Investment) Co Ltd[1984] 1 WLR 6096Wallis Fashions Group Ltd v CGU Life Assurance (2001) 81 P&CR 28.Davy’s of London (Wine Merchants) Ltd v City of London Corporation[2004] EWHC 2224 (Ch) Edwards & Walkden (Norfolk) Ltd v City of London Corporation[2013] 1 P&CR 10Date 2021-07-14

Cited in 7 later judgments