“The Traffic Commissioner has asked that this note be brought to the attention of the senior judge…as a matter of urgency, so as to avoid a waste of resource and tribunal time. Upon reviewing the papers in respect of this appeal it has come to the attention of the Traffic Commissioner that there was an error within the original submission and the processing of the supporting documentation provided. The applicant submitted bank statements in the form of editable Excel spreadsheets, unfortunately it was not noted by the processing staff member that each statement comprised of three worksheets, each covering a different month. In total spreadsheets were submitted for ten different bank accounts. While the statements submitted did not cover a full and consecutive twenty-eight day period for al of the accounts so as to allow an assessment to be made as described in Statutory Document 2, there was sufficient evidence for a calculation to be conducted across eight of the accounts; these have now been completed as detailed in document 39 of the bundle. Although the calculations still indicate a substantial shortfall from the requirement, they paint a different picture as to the potential lines that might have been followed with the applicant before reaching a final determination. The Traffic Commissioner…is therefore inviting the Upper Tribunal to remit the matter back to the OTC, without the need for a hearing, so that a decision can be taken on the basis of a correct calculation and/or to allow the applicant to make further representations.”