Sir George Clerk of Pennycuik, Baronet, and Others - Lord Advocate (Jeffrey - Spankie v. Dr. Walter Adam - Lushingto - C. H. Maclean [1832] UKHL 6_WS_141

UKHL
Sir George Clerk of Pennycuik, Baronet, and Others - Lord Advocate (Jeffrey - Spankie v. Dr. Walter Adam - Lushingto - C. H. Maclean
[1832] UKHL 6_WS_141 · 1832-07-16
Whether a portrait of a late rector of the High School of Edinburgh, taken at the request and expense of an association of his pupils, and placed in the schoolroom, be, after his death, and on the removal of the school to a new building, the property of the association, or of his son and representative? The Court of Session having found it to be the property of the association, but decerned that it should remain in the High School, the House of Lords reversed the latter finding.In the year 1808, Dr. Adam, then and who had been since 1768 rector of the High School of Edinburgh, was requested by Sir George Clerk and other persons who had been educated at that school, and were members of an association called the High School Club, to sit for his portrait, to be taken by Sir Henry Raeburn. The letter addressed to Dr. Adam, on this occasion, was as follows:favour to sit to Mr. Raeburn for your picture. We are anxious to place in the school a memorial of our gratitude, and of the high sense we entertain of the advantages the public has derived for so many years from your useful and important labours. We flatter ourselves you will not be disposed to refuse this favour, when you reflect, that we can ask it from no other motive but those of the most sincere regard and esteem, and that it may serve as an inducement to those who shall come after you to emulate the able and conscientious discharge of your official duties, by which you have contributed so much to extend the fame of our flourishing seminary.”
“21st March 1808. Dear Sir, at a meeting of the High School Club some days ago, for the purpose of consulting how the members could best show you some mark of their regard, we are appointed a committee for carrying their resolutions into effect. In pursuance of these resolutions, we now beg leave to request that you will do us the

Page: 142 ↓

Dr. Adam acceded to this request, and the portrait was accordingly taken; and afterwards, on the 9th of August 1809, Dr. Adam wrote to a member of the club as follows:and that their reasons for doing so, which you so handsomely expressed in your first letter to me on the subject, may be shortly mentioned. The shorter and more simple the inscription is made the better.”
“Dear Sir, I have been so much taken up with one thing or another since I received your kind favour, that I could not sooner find leisure to acknowledge it. I feel my desire to prosecute this work (Dictionary) increased by the conspicuous manner in which you and your friends have been pleased to exhibit me to public view. I went yesterday to Mr. Raeburn's with a gentleman who was desirous to see the picture, and found it decorated with a very splendid frame, Very different indeed from what it was in at the public exhibition. You have ordered every thing concerning it with so much propriety, and so far beyond my expectation, that whatever you determine with respect to the placing of it, and the inscription, will be quite agreeable to me. I have only to request, that the names of those gentlemen who have done me so great honour may be recorded,

Page: 143 ↓

Dr. Adam having died in December 1809, and before the picture was placed, a petition was presented by the members of the High School Club to the magistrates of Edinburgh, as the patrons of that seminary, for permission to place the portrait in the High School library; and a special request was made that the magistrates would acknowledge, in their deliverance on the said petition, that the property of the portrait remained with the petitioners, and that they, or the majority of the survivors of them, might at any time thereafter dispose of the same as they should think fit; and that the portrait should not be at the disposal of the magistrates of the city during the survivance of any of the petitioners; and that failing them, and all provision by them to the contrary, the magistrates should then preserve the picture in perpetuam rei memoriam.The magistrates granted the prayer of the petition, and authorized the picture to be placed in the High School library upon the terms therein mentioned. The picture was accordingly placed in the High School library, with this inscription, “This portrait of Alexander Adam, LL.D., rector of the High School from June 8, 1768, to December 18, 1809, author of Roman Antiquities, &c., was placed here as a mark of gratitude and respect by fourteen of his former pupils, A. D. 1810.” There the picture remained till the removal of the school, in 1829, from the old premises in the High School yard to those erected on the Calton Hill, to which new premises the picture

Page: 144 ↓

March 2, 1831.The magistrates, upon this petition being presented, made intimation thereof to Dr. Walter Adam, the son and heir of Dr. Adam, who thereupon entered a claim to the effect of having the picture disposed of in terms of the condition on which his father consented to sit for it, and which condition he stated to be, that the picture should remain in the library of the High School as a part of its property, and be independent of the controul of the High School Club, or any other person or persons whatever. To obtain a decision on these opposite claims, the magistrates raised an action of multiplepoinding, and called as parties Dr. Walter Adam and the surviving members of the High School Club; and the Lord Ordinary found, “that the picture in question is the property of the claimants, Sir George Clerk baronet, and others, members of the High School Club: Finds that the intention expressed by them, of placing it in the library of the High School, was not a condition stipulated in favour of Doctor Adam or his representatives, on which they are entitled to found in this action: Finds there is evidence that it was not so understood by Dr. Adam himself: Prefers Sir George Clerk baronet, and others, members of the High School Club, to the picture in question, and grants warrant to, authorizes and ordains the

Page: 145 ↓

Against this interlocutor Dr. Walter Adam reclaimed to the Court of Session, praying inter alia that the Court should find that the intention expressed by the members of the High School Club, of placing the portrait in question in the library of the High School, was a condition stipulated in favour of the late Dr. Adam, and was so understood by him, upon which the claimant Dr. Walter Adam is entitled to found in this action.June 10, 1831.The First Division adhered “to the interlocutor reclaimed against, in so far as it finds that the picture in question is the property of the claimants, the members of the High School Club: but, quoad ultra, they alter the said interlocutor, and find that it was an implied condition in the treaty betwixt the Club and the late Dr. Alexander Adam, when he sat for his picture to the late Mr. Henry Raeburn, that the portrait was to be placed in the High School of Edinburgh, as a memorial of the high sense the claimants entertained of the advantages the public derived from his useful and important labours, and as an inducement to those who might come after him to emulate the able and conscientious discharge of his official duties, by which he had contributed so much to extend the fame of the High School: And they accordingly decern and declare, that the said picture shall remain in the High School of Edinburgh in perpetuam rei memoriam; and that the Magistrates and Council of the city of Edinburgh, as the patrons of that seminary, shall be answerable that it is properly placed therein, agreeably to the object in view, and

Page: 146 ↓

Of this judgment, excepting in so far as it found “that the picture in question is the property of the claimants, the members of the High School Club,” Sir George Clerk and others complained, and appealed.Appellants .—The appellants are, without dispute, the proprietors of the picture, and are therefore entitled to the custody and to the disposal of it.There was no contract, express or implied, between the appellants and the late Dr. Adam, by which the appellants bound themselves to deposit the picture in question for ever in the High School. Even although there were reason, from the terms of the letter of March 1808, to hold that there was an implied contract between Dr. Adam and the appellants that his portrait should be hung up in one particular place, still the Doctor, by his subsequent communication with the appellants, viz. by his letter to them of 9th August 1809, plainly intimated that he did not understand that there was any such implied contract.On the contrary, when the appellants placed the portrait in the school, they stipulated with the proprietors of the building, who are patrons of the school, that they, the appellants, should be entitled at any time during their lives to withdraw the portrait; but, in face of this agreement, the portrait has been removed from the local situation in which the appellants and the late Dr. Adam contemplated that it should remain. It was no part of the understanding between the appellants and Dr. Adam

Footnote

* 9 Shaw and Dun. 379.

Page: 147 ↓

Respondent. —The respondent has a legal title and interest to enforce every agreement entered into with his deceased father; and, in particular, to insist that his portrait shall be applied to the purpose or placed in the situation to which it was destined by the transaction, agreement, or understanding in virtue of which his father consented that it should be formed or painted.If the appellants have any right of property in the portrait in question, which seems more than doubtful, yet as, by the original proposal which they made to Dr. Adam, in virtue of which he was induced to sit for his portrait, it was destined to a specific public purpose, the appellants are bound by the terms of their own proposal, which it is not competent for them (nor have the town council the power) to alter after the death of Dr. Adam, more especially in the face of opposition by the respondent, his son and legal representative, and without the decided approbation of the patrons of the High School of Edinburgh.It was in that school that Dr. Adam understood that his portrait was to be placed, and remain, and in that school it is intended to deposit it, for the institution is not altered, but improved, by the accommodation afforded by a new and finer building. Cadell, 1st June 1804. (Mor. 3 App., voce Literary property.)

Lord Chancellor :—My Lords, in this case it appears that a society was formed in Edinburgh, consisting of gentlemen who had been educated in the High

Page: 148 ↓

“March 1808. Dear Sir,—At a meeting of the High School Club some days ago, for the purpose of consulting how the members could best show you some mark of their regard, we are appointed a committee for carrying their resolutions into effect. In pursuance of these resolutions, we now beg leave to request that you will do us the favour to sit to Mr. Raeburn for your picture. We are anxious to place in the school a memorial of our gratitude, and of the high sense we entertain of the advantages the public has derived for so many years from your useful and important labours. We flatter ourselves you will not be disposed to refuse this favour, when you reflect, that we can ask it from no other motive but those of the most sincere regard and esteem, and that it may serve as an inducement to those who shall come after you to emulate the able and conscientious discharge of your official duties, by which you have contributed so much to extend the fame of our flourishing seminary.”
The answer to this letter does not appear, but the result was, that Dr. Adam sat for his picture to Mr. Raeburn,

Page: 149 ↓

The case having been argued, Lord Corehouse, the Lord Ordinary, before whom it was heard, pronounced an interlocutor, in which I entirely concur. (Quotes Lord Corehouse's interlocutor.)My Lords,an appeal to the Inner House against this interlocutor was brought by Dr. Adam, of whose motives and conduct I wish to speak, not only with no harshness, but with the greatest possible tenderness and respect. His conduct has been dictated solely by filial piety, and a deep consideration for the character of his much-respected father. He has involved himself in a litigation, in which he has exposed

Page: 150 ↓

Page: 151 ↓

Now, my Lords, I certainly cannot go along with the finding which constitutes that alteration. The property in the picture is distinctly found to be in these claimants. But what kind of property in a personal chattel can a man be said to have, if, at the same time that you affirm the property in that chattel to be in him, you also affirm that there is in another a right wholly inconsistent with almost every one incident of property in the owner? For the magistrates and council are to have the custody of the picture; to have the possession and deposit; to put it in a place in which the others can have no access to it. To find that property belongs to A., but on condition thata. A. shall not have any controul over it—that it belongs to A., but A. shall have no use of it—that it belongs to A., but thatb. B. shall enjoy it—appears most inconsistent. If such a restriction of property, so declared to be in the individual, could be established, it certainly would have required the most stringent evidence in order to sustain it.Now, let us see what are the grounds on which the interlocutor proceeds which places this restriction upon the property. It is supposed to rest on an implied condition. The respondent says that there was an implied condition between the club and Dr. Adam, when he sat for his picture, that if he would sit for that picture they should use it in one way, and none other. This is the only ground which is stated for the putting a restriction on the use of the property. The only consistent way of stating it is, that there was a condition expressed or implied between Dr. Adam and the gentlemen,

Page: 152 ↓

Then we fall back on the condition. If that can be established at all, it must be extracted from one or other or all of these three matters which have been put forward in argument,—the letter of the 21st of March 1808; the act of sitting; and the letter of the 9th of August 1809. Now, I have read to your Lordships the first letter, that of 21st March 1808, and I cannot see how any part of it, followed by the only act of the party, the sitting, can amount to any thing like a condition imposed by him upon them, of using the picture in a particular way. Much stress is laid upon the expression of their wish to show some mark of their regard. What then is the mark of regard? It is having the picture painted for themselves; asking him to sit for his picture at their cost. I show my regard for a person by asking him to sit for his picture at my cost, and that I may use it as my property; that

Page: 153 ↓

Page: 154 ↓

Let us look, then, to the third of these pieces of evidence, which is the letter of Dr. Adam, dated the 9th of August 1809. I take it to be perfectly clear, that the representatives of Dr. Adam can stand in no better situation, in respect of this claim, than Dr. Adam stood himself; that they can have no higher right to interfere in this matter than he would have had if he had interposed during his life. After the perusal of the letter to which I am about to call your Lordships' attention, I hold it to be perfectly clear, that whatever might have been considered, whatever doubt might have existed with respect to the rights of the parties under the first part of the negotiation in 1808, the letter of these gentlemen to Dr. Adam, and the act of sitting, this letter of the 9th of August 1809 must remove all doubt. It is in these terms, addressed to one of the gentlemen:—public view. I went yesterday to Mr. Raeburn's with a gentleman who was desirous to see the picture, and found it decorated with a very splendid frame, very different indeed from what it was in at the public exhibition. You have ordered every thing concerning it with so much propriety, and so far beyond my expectation, that whatever you determine with respect to the placing of it, and the inscription, will be quite agreeable to me.”
“Dear Sir,—I have been so much taken up with one thing or another since I received your kind favour, that I could not sooner find leisure to acknowledge it. I feel my desire to prosecute this work (Dictionary) increased by the conspicuous manner in which you and your friends have been pleased to exhibit me to

Page: 155 ↓

Even supposing there had been any condition previously, even supposing they had tied themselves down to hang it in a particular place, supposing he had at the time acquired any right, this is an entire relinquishment of right of interference, if any such had previously existed:
“whatever you determine with respect to the placing of it, and the inscription, will be quite agreeable to me.”
There is another observation I would make, and which goes very strongly to show that there was no condition, previously to the portrait being taken, as to where it should be placed. The negotiation and the actual sitting were long before these gentlemen had obtained leave to hang up the picture in the schoolroom. That room was not theirs any more than it was Dr. Adam's; it belonged to the magistrates. This negotiation took place before any permission to hang it there had been asked; and that fact, at any rate, goes strongly to negative the notion of any condition made between the parties, that it should be hung up in this particular room. I will not trouble your Lordships with any reference to what took place before the magistrates in the year 1810; but perhaps it is not immaterial to observe, that it precludes the magistrates from

Page: 156 ↓

Page: 157 ↓

Page: 158 ↓

My Lords,I have made some inquiry with respect to the costs. There is no doubt that Dr. Walter Adam has interfered from a feeling highly honourable to him; and under those circumstances I am quite sure, from what I know of the appellants, that they will never suffer those costs to fall upon him. If in substance they are not to be paid by the magistrates, but by Dr. Walter Adam, I am certain that those gentlemen will not permit him to pay one farthing of the costs. I will now move

Page: 159 ↓

The House of Lords ordered and adjudged, “That the said interlocutor, so far as complained of in the said appeal, be, and the same is hereby reversed.”Solicitors: Richardson and Connell— Spottiswoode and Robertson—Solicitors.