Beevers v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 38 (TC)

FTT-Tax
Beevers v Revenue & Customs
[2014] UKFTT 38 (TC) · 2013-12-23
[1]Introduction This considers an appeal against a penalty of £100 levied by the respondents for the late filing by the appellant of its individual tax return for the tax year 2011 – 2012.[2]Legislation Finance Act 2009 Schedule 55 Taxes Management Act 1970, in particular Section 8(1D)[3]Case law Rowland v HMRC [2006] STC (SCD)536 Anthony Wood t/as Propave v HMRC [2011] UK FTT 136 (TC) TC 001010[4]Facts The filing date for an individual tax return is determined by Section 8 (1D) of the Taxes Management Act 1970. For the period ended 5 April 2012 an electronic return must be filed by 31 January 2013.[5]It appears that for some reason HMRC cancelled the User ID and password used by the appellant in submitting past returns. On 28 January 2013 it was confirmed that the appellant did not have the necessary details to enable him to file his return. It was agreed to defer the filing date for the 2011-2012 return to 15 February 2013 to allow for receipt of the password and for the activation process to take place.[6]In respect of the year 2011-2012 the appellant failed to submit his individual tax return until 2 May 2013. As the return was not submitted by the revised filing date of 15 February 2013 HMRC issued a notice of penalty assessment on 19 February 2013 in the amount of £100.[7]Appellant’s submissions In a letter dated 28 February 2013 the appellant appealed to HMRC against the Notice of penalty assessment. He pointed out the difficulties that had occurred over the User ID and password and that the filing date had been deferred to 15 February 2013. He said that he had completed his return online on 12 February 2013.[8]HMRC replied on 17 April 2013 by saying they could not consider the appeal because the return had not yet been received.[9]After the return was submitted on 2 May 2013 HMRC reviewed the appeal and wrote to the appellant on 19 June 2013 saying they did not accept that he had reasonable excuse for the late submission because he did not attempt to submit his tax return on 12 February 2013.The letter offered a review.[10]On 13 July 2013 the appellant wrote to HMRC asking for a review. The letter included the following:
“I contend that I did fully complete the tax return on12 February and believed that I had submitted it. It became clear when I checked after receiving the penalty notice that, having completed the return I did not fully complete the submission. It is an easy mistake to make and I believe that HMRC is aware that this is what happened.”
[11]HMRC replied on 30 August 2013 saying that they did not accept that the mistake made by the appellant constituted a reasonable excuse.[12]In his notice of appeal dated 28 September 2013 the appellant states:
“I believe HMRC’s decision is unjust because in their letter of 19 June 2013 their main point was that following an extension of the deadline to 15 February 2013 due to HMRC error: quote “…you did not attempt to submit your tax return on 12 February 2013.”
This is categorically incorrect as, in their letter of 30 August 2013, they accept that I did complete the return on that date but made a mistake, after fully completing the return, in not pressing the final submit button. I contend that the process of fully completing the return except for pressing the submit button does constitute an attempt to submit it because I was unaware that it had not been transmitted. Note that my appeal dated 28 February was made in the belief that it had been received by HMRC.[13]In a letter dated 17 November 2013the appellant makes similar points.[14]HMRC Submissions HMRC say the appellant has filed self-assessment returns online since 2007-2008 and is therefore experienced with the self-assessment system and the online filing process and therefore he was aware of the obligation to file her tax returns by the filing deadline.[15]HMRC say the appellant has confirmed that he was in receipt of the user ID and password on 12 February 2013 and that he did attempt to file his return on that date. However he did not proceed to submit the return on that date. They say that whilst filing there is a constant reminder on the top right hand side of the screen advising of progress as a percentage. On successfully filing the tax return the on screen message will show “100% successful” and a submission receipt reference number for the tax return is shown. The filer also receives an e-mail from HMRC advising that their records have been updated. When the appellant did not receive the prompt that he had been 100% successful and in the absence of an e-mail he should have been aware that his tax return had not been fully submitted.[16]HMRC say that whilst they accept that the appellant made an honest mistake nevertheless this cannot be regarded as a reasonable excuse for the failure to submit the return on time.[17]HMRC say the penalty was correctly imposed in accordance with Paragraph 3 of Schedule 55 of the Finance Act 2009.[18]Tribunal’s Observations The Tribunal’s has considered these submissions and comments as follows: It is the appellant’s responsibility to submit returns on time. The appellant has been filing his individual tax return online since 2007-2008 and was aware of the annual deadline of 31 January and his obligation to send a return by that date. The return for the period 2011 -2012 was due to be submitted online by 31 January 2013, later extended to 15 February 2013, but it was submitted late on 2 May 2013. A penalty of £100 is therefore due unless the appellant can establish a reasonable excuse for the delay as referred to in Paragraph 23(1) Schedule 55 Finance Act 2009.[19]The appellant admits that having completed his return electronically he made the simple mistake of omitting to press the final submit button.[20]A reasonable excuse is normally an unexpected or unusual event that is unforeseeable or beyond the taxpayer’s control, and which prevents them from complying with their obligation to file on time. In the Tribunal’s view this unfortunate simple omission by the appellant cannot establish a reasonable excuse for the failure to submit the return by the due date. It is a quick and simple process to check whether or not a return has been submitted and the appellant could have done this on 13, 14 or 15 February 2013.16. Paragraph 16 (1) of Schedule 55 Finance Act 2009 allows HMRC to reduce the penalty below the statutory minimum if they think it is right because of special circumstances. HMRC have considered whether there any special circumstances in this case which would allow them to reduce the penalty and have concluded there are none. The Tribunal sees no reason to disagree.17. HMRC has applied the late filing penalty in accordance with legislation. The appellant has not established a reasonable excuse for the late submission of his individual tax return for the period 2011-2012. There are no special circumstances to allow reduction of the penalty. Therefore the appeal is dismissed.18. This document contains full findings of fact and reasons for the decision. Any party dissatisfied with this decision has a right to apply for permission to appeal against it pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009. The application must be received by this Tribunal not later than 56 days after this decision is sent to that party. The parties are referred to “Guidance to accompany a Decision from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)” which accompanies and forms part of this decision notice. PETER R. SHEPPARD TRIBUNAL PRESIDING MEMBER RELEASE DATE: 23 December 2013