two adjoining cottages. Both titles appeared to show that the passageway formed part of R-™s title. A applied to alter her title to remove the note on the property register apparently excluding the passageway from her title. A was successful. There was a clear mistake caused in part by the existence of a flying freehold over part of R-™s title v in part by a complex conveyancing history.</P><BR><P>A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : <a href="/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2018/2017_0685.pdf">[2018] UKFTT 440 (PC)</a></P> <div align="center" class="make-database"><object data="2017_0685.pdf" type="application/pdf" width="95%" height="95%"></object></div> [2018] UKFTT 440 (PC)
[2018] UKFTT 440 (PC). The dispute was over the ownership of a passageway/hallway between two adjoining cottages. Both titles appeared to show that the passageway formed part of R-™s title. A applied to alter her title to remove the note on the property register apparently excluding the passageway from her title. A was successful. There was a clear mistake caused in part by the existence of a flying freehold over part of R-™s title and in part by a complex conveyancing history.A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2018] UKFTT 440 (PC)