"32 So far as reasonable adjustments are concerned, there were no reasonable adjustments which could be required of the Respondents that they had not already made. They had transferred the Applicant to an office nearer to her home, which did not involve her in long-distance travelling. She was only in that office for a period of two to three weeks before her absence in March 1998. She never returned to that office. ……. 34 The Tribunal have no doubt that, had the Applicant returned to work, any reasonable adjustment which could have been made with regard to VDU and/or telephone operation would have occurred. However the Applicant was simply unable to return due to her illness……. 37. …….The requirement to make all reasonable adjustments is for the purpose of maintaining an employee at work or to enable him or her to return. It is not, in our assessment, an adjustment that can be reasonably required of an employer that he should retain somebody in his employment for a longer period than it would be reasonable to do so in order that a pecuniary advantage might be obtained from a third party. Having considered section 6 of the Disability Discrimination Act, we are of the opinion that this would be contrary to the purposes of the Act and, in particular, contrary to section 6(11) of the Act, which expressly provides that such adjustments are not to be required."