MR B D JONES v ICS CLEANING SERVICES AND MR K TRIGG [1999] UKEAT 811_99_0111
[1]APPEARANCES For the Appellant Mr P O'Brien (Representative) 1 Stonecross St Albans Herts AL1 4AA JUDGE WILSON: Mr O'Brien we have considered carefully the matters that you have set out in your skeleton argument and amplified in your oral submissions to us. We think that this case should be fully argued upon the following points:-[2]Whether, in the context of the rest of the Employment Tribunal decision and in light of the judgement of this Tribunal in Reed V Stedman [1999] IRLR 299, the Employment Tribunal in the appellant's case erred in law in adopting the approach to the sex discrimination claim set out in Paragraphs 9.1 to 9.7 of the decision.[3]On that point alone we think that there should be a full argument and we think, because of the developing nature of this particular area of law, it should be Category A and a half-day should be allowed for it, 3 hours.