18 Hillside Walk, Blackburn, Lancashire, BB1 2BQ: MAN/00EX/MNR/2026/0117 MAN/00EX/MNR/2026/0117

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No MAN/00EX/MNR/2026/0117
Abdul Sami & Saliha SamiApplicantSophia KhanRespondentAbdul Sami & Saliha SamiTenantSophia KhanLandlord
Tribunal Judge Steer & Mr J FaulknerFRICSDate 19 May 2026Property: 18 Hillside Walk, Blackburn, Lancashire, BB1 2BQType of application: sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Judge Steer & Mr J Faulkner

REASONS

[3]On 13 February 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £800.00 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £650.00 pcm to take effect from 1 May 2026. On 9 March 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The assured tenancy commenced on 1 August 2020 which appears to be for an initial fixed term although the length of term is illegible from the copy of the assured shorthold tenancy agreement provided by the Tenant. The tenancy continues as a statutory periodic tenancy at the end of the fixed term. The rental period is monthly. Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.[4]As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.[5]There are no service charges payable in respect of the Property which was let to the Tenants on an ‘unfurnished’ basis. Liability for Council Tax[6]The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax. Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.[7]None Inspection/Hearing[8]The Tenant did not request a property inspection or an oral hearing. The Landlord did not respond to the Tenant’s application and has provided no evidence to the Tribunal. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the Tenant and its own knowledge and specialist expertise. 2 The Property[9]The Property is a 2-storey terrace house with a garden built in the 1970’s and accessed by a pedestrian walkway. The tenancy agreement states that the Property is let unfurnished. The accommodation comprises a ground floor living room and kitchen and there are two bedrooms, a box room and a bathroom with w/c on the first floor. Evidence The Landlord[10]The Landlord did not return the Tribunal’s Reply form or provide any evidence to the Tribunal to support the proposed rental increase. The Tenant[12]The Tenant made the following comments: a) The garage does not form part of the demise of the Property and is not accessible to the Tenant given that it is rented to a third party; b) The Property does not have direct road access either from the front or the rear of the Property. The front of the Property leads to a pedestrian walkway meaning that vehicular access is restricted. The rear of the Property is accessed via a narrow alleyway which is in poor condition; and c) Generally, that the rental increase proposed by the Landlord is above market rent for the Property when considering the above issues and the comparable rents on the same street. In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant has provided two comparable achieved rents on the same street as the subject property which are of the same type and lay out as the subject property. The first is 16 Hillside Walk and the current rent payable is £550 pcm. The second is 20 Hillside Walk and the current rent payable is £500 pcm. The Tenant states that the proposed rent of £800 pcm is above market rent for a terraced property and provided evidence of a semi detached property in the locality which is marketed for rent at £800 pcm. Determination and Valuation[15]The Tribunal considers that the comparables provided by the Tenant are relevant to this matter particularly in light of the fact that they appear to be current achieved rents for the same type of property on the same street. Relying on its own expertise and general knowledge of rental values in the area, the current rent and the comparables provided by the Tenant, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property is £650 pcm. This is the 3 rent we would expect the Property to let for in the open market. The Tribunal did not consider it necessary to make any adjustments to this level of rent. Decision[16]Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £650.00 per calendar month with effect from 01 May 2026. 4 APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal. 5