CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
75 Ambleside Gardens, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5HN LON/00BF/F77/2023/0311
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
LON/00BF/F77/2023/0311
Between
Mr S Watson
Applicant
Orbit Housing Association Ltd (Exempt Charity)
Respondent
Mr S Watson
Tenant
Orbit Housing Association Ltd (Exempt Charity)
Landlord
Before
Judge D Brandler
Date
11 December 2023
Property: 75 Ambleside Gardens, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5HN
DECISION
The sum of
£216.00
per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from
11 December 2023
, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 SUMMARY REASONS FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 Background
[1]
Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the
Rent Act 1977
. The Landlord’s objection relates solely to the registered service charge. The ground of appeal is that the registered service charge is significantly lower than the amount applied for. They have provided the service charge budget and actual costs for the latest available financial year to support their application. The Landlord has not provided a copy of the tenancy agreement. Inspection
[2]
The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence
[3]
The Landlord provided a response which has been considered. There were no written submissions from the Tenant. Determination and Valuation
[4]
In the absence of the tenancy agreement, and therefore the absence of the tenant’s obligation to pay an increased service charge, and in the absence of any submissions from the Tenant, the Tribunal adopted the Rent Officer’s assessment of service charges. It is of note that in the response from the Landlord in relation to communal gardens they write “Unknown”, which may suggest that the Tenant does not have access to communal spaces. There is no explanation from the Landlord why they are charging him “Grounds Contract”. In the absence of any comparable evidence provided by the parties and having consideration for our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of
£320
per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: The tenants own furnishings, flooring, carpets and white goods
[5]
The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.
[6]
The full valuation is shown below: per week Market Rent
£320.00
Less To reflect the tenants own furnishings, flooring, carpets and white goods Approx. 15.5%
£50.00
£270.00
Less Scarcity approx. 20%
£54.00
£216.00
3
[7]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£216.00
per week. Decision
[8]
The uncapped fair rent determined by the Tribunal was
£216.00
per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
is calculated at
£236.13
per week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of
£216
per week is to be registered as the fair rent or this property. Chairman: Judge Brandler Date:
11 December 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them