Room 1, 1 Holly Way, Mitcham, Surrey CR4 1PD LON/00BA/HTC/2021/0007
DECISION
Covid-19 pandemic: description of hearing This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has not been objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was P:PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and no-one requested the same and all issues could be determined on paper. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in a bundle of 17 pages, the contents of which have been noted. Order The Tribunal makes the following Order, pursuant to section 15 of the Tenant Fees Act 2019 (“the Act”):(1) On or before 20th July 2021, the Respondents shall re-pay the amount of 250.00 paid in respect of the tenancy deposit for Room 1, 1 Holly Way, Mitcham, Surrey CR4 1PD, and(2) In accordance with section 15(11) of the Tenant Fees Act 2019, such Order is enforceable by order of the county court as if the amount payable under the Order were payable under an order of that court Background[1]This is an application for an order for the recovery of a prohibited payment / holding deposit paid in respect of a prospective tenancy of Room 1, 11 Holly Way, Mitcham, Surrey CR4 1PD, pursuant to section 15 of the Tenant Fees Act 2019.[2]The application form and supporting documents appear to confirm that on 9th February 2021 the first and/or second respondents received payment of £250 from or on behalf of the applicant, but that, despite requests, neither respondent has repaid that amount. The amount of the proposed rent appears to have been £400 per month (which equates to a weekly rent of £92.31).[3]The payment appears to be a prohibited payment/holding deposit within the meaning of the Tenant Fees Act 2019 (£157.69 prohibited payment and £92.31 holding deposit, holding deposits being capped at one week’s rent). If so, the tribunal would be empowered to order recovery of all or part of that amount from the respondent.[4]The issue to determine whether the Tribunal should make an order under section 15 of the Act for the respondent to pay all or any part of the amount to the applicant.[5]On 17th May 2021, the Tribunal issued directions to the parties. Only the Applicant has complied with the directions and the Respondent has not engaged at all in these proceedings.[6]This matter proceeds on the basis of the evidence filed by the Applicant. Relevant Law[7]This is set out in the Appendix annexed hereto. Decision[8]The determination of the application took place on 6th July 2021 without an oral hearing. It was based solely on the application and other documentary evidence filed by the Applicant.[9]Under the terms of the Act, landlords and letting agents must not require tenants (including prospective tenants and guarantors) to make any prohibited payments. In short, a payment is a "prohibited payment" unless it is a permitted payment as listed in Schedule 1 of the Act below.[10]A landlord may seek a holding deposit from a prospective tenant to reserve a property, however, such holding deposit must be repaid within 7 days of the landlord and tenant either:(a) Entering into a tenancy agreement,(b) The landlord decides not to enter into a tenancy agreement; or(c) The landlord and tenant fail to enter into a tenancy agreement by the deadline.[11]The Act provides that the deadline for the landlord and prospective tenant to enter into a tenancy agreement is 15 days and where this does not happen the landlord will have to repay the holding deposit to the prospective tenant within 7 days. The Act does, however, permit a landlord and prospective tenant to agree in writing a different deadline rather than 15 days.[12]A landlord can only retain a tenant’s holding deposit if they provide false or misleading information which reasonably affects the decision to let the property to them, they fail a right to rent check, withdraw from the proposed agreement or fail to take all reasonable steps to enter an agreement when the landlord and/or agent has done so.[13]On the basis of the evidence provided by the Applicant, the Tribunal made the following findings of fact:(a) that the Applicant paid a holding deposit to the Respondents on or about 9th February 2021 for the rental of a room in the subject property in the sum of £250.(b) That one week’s rent for the property was £92.31.(c) that the payment of £250 represented more than one week’s rent in breach of paragraph 3(3) in Schedule 1 below of the Act.(d) that the Respondents failed to grant the Applicant a tenancy of the premises on 4TH March 2021 as agreed.(e) that the Respondents have failed to return the Applicant’s holding deposit of £250 within 15 days of the payment made by the Applicant.[14]Therefore, the Tribunal was satisfied that the payment of £250 to the Respondents was a prohibited payment within the meaning of paragraph 3(3) in Schedule 1 to the Act.[15]Accordingly, the Tribunal made an order under section 15 (9) of the Act for the Respondent to refund the payment of £250 to the Applicant by 20th July 2021.[16]By section 15(11) of the Act, this Order is enforceable by order of the county court as if the amount payable under the Order were payable under an order of that court. Name: Tribunal Judge D Brandler Date: 6th July 2021 RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.[2]The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.[3]If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. APPENDIX of relevant legislation SCHEDULE 1 Permitted payments Holding deposit 3(1) Subject to sub-paragraphs (3) to (6), a payment of a holding deposit is a permitted payment. (2) In this Act “holding deposit” means money which is paid by or on behalf of a tenant to a landlord or letting agent before the grant of a tenancy with the intention that it should be dealt with by the landlord or letting agent in accordance with Schedule 2 (treatment of holding deposit). (3) If the amount of the holding deposit exceeds one week’s rent, the amount of the excess is a prohibited payment. (4) In sub-paragraph (3) “one week’s rent” means the amount of the annual rent payable in respect of the tenancy immediately after its grant, renewal or continuance divided by 52. (5) A payment of a holding deposit is not a permitted payment if—(a) the landlord or letting agent to whom the deposit was paid has previously received a holding deposit (“the earlier deposit”) in relation to the same housing,(b) the landlord or letting agent has not repaid all or part of the earlier deposit, and(c) none of paragraphs 6 to 12 of Schedule 2 have applied so as to permit the landlord or letting agent not to repay the earlier deposit or the part that has not been repaid. (6) The reference in sub-paragraph (5)(a) to a landlord or letting agent receiving a holding deposit does not include the landlord or letting agent doing so before the coming into force of Schedule 2.[15]Recovery by relevant person of amount paid(1) Subsection (3) applies where— (a) a landlord or a letting agent breaches section 1 or 2, as a result of which the landlord or letting agent, or a third party, receives a prohibited payment from a relevant person, and (b) all or part of the prohibited payment has not been repaid to the relevant person.(2) Subsection (3) also applies where— (a) a landlord or letting agent breaches Schedule 2 in relation to a holding deposit paid by a relevant person, and (b) all or part of the holding deposit has not been repaid to the relevant person.(3) The relevant person may make an application to the First-tier Tribunal for the recovery from the landlord or letting agent of— (a) if none of the prohibited payment or holding deposit has been repaid to the relevant person, the amount of the prohibited payment or holding deposit; (b) if part of the prohibited payment or holding deposit has been repaid to the relevant person, the remaining part of the prohibited payment or holding deposit.(4) Subsection (5) applies where— (a) a landlord or letting agent breaches section 1 or 2, as a result of which a relevant person enters into a contract with a third party, and (b) the relevant person has made a payment or payments under the contract.(5) The relevant person may make an application to the First-tier Tribunal for the recovery from the landlord or letting agent of the amount of the payment or (as the case may be) the aggregate amount of the payments that the relevant person has made.(6) Subsection (3) does not apply in relation to a prohibited payment or holding deposit if or to the extent that, with the consent of the relevant person— (a) the prohibited payment or holding deposit, or the remaining part of it, has been applied towards a payment of rent under the tenancy, or (b) the prohibited payment or holding deposit, or the remaining part of it, has been applied towards the tenancy deposit in respect of the tenancy.(7) Subsection (3) or (5) does not apply where an enforcement authority has commenced criminal proceedings against the landlord or the letting agent for the same breach.(8) Subsection (3) or (5) does not apply where an enforcement authority has required the landlord or letting agent to pay to the relevant person all or part of the amount or (as the case may be) the aggregate amount referred to in that subsection.(9) On an application under subsection (3) or (5), the First-tier Tribunal may order the landlord or the letting agent to pay all or any part of the amount or (as the case may be) the aggregate amount referred to in that subsection to the relevant person within the period specified in the order.(10) A period specified under subsection (9) must be a period of at least 7 days but not more than 14 days beginning with the day after that on which the order is made.(11) An order of the First-tier Tribunal under this section is enforceable by order of the county court as if the amount payable under the order were payable under an order of that court