1-24 Newton House, Union Grove, London, SW8 2RZ LON/00AY/LDC/2022/0022

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL

PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case No LON/00AY/LDC/2022/0022

Between

The Mayor & Burgesses London Borough of LambethApplicant

Leaseholders of 1-24 Newton House, Union Grove, London, SW8 2RZ set out on the Schedule belowRespondent

The Mayor & Burgesses LondonLandlord

Before

Mr Charles Norman FRICS

Mrs Louise Crane MCIEH

Mr Rasel Ahmed Tenants/ for the Applicant

Date 9 May 2022

Property: London, SW8 2RZ

DECISION

Covid-19 pandemic: description of determination This has been a remote determination. The form of remote determination was P: PAPERREMOTE. A face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable, no-one requested the same, and all matters could be determined on the papers. The documents that the Tribunal were referred to are in a bundle of 43 pages, the contents of which the Tribunal has noted. Decision

[1]Dispensation in respect of costs of £15,187.50 (plus VAT) to repair a severe leak on the incoming main water supply is GRANTED UNCONDITIONALLY.

REASONS

[1]On 31 January 2021, the applicant applied for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of repairs which have been carried out to remedy a severe leak on the incoming main water supply. This was said to be leaking into the electrical intake cupboard within the building. Repairs were therefore urgent.

[2]On 18 March 2021, the Tribunal set the case down for determination by written representations unless any party objected, which none did. The applicant was directed to serve the application on the respondents and give publicity within the common parts of the property. The Applicants’ Case

[3]On 11 January 2022, the Council was notified of the leak. T Brown Group, the Council’s long term contractor was instructed and isolated the water supply. This caused major disruption to the tenants. Owing to a health and safety risk to the residents the works were undertaken as an emergency and consultation was not possible.

[4]Following Daejan Investments Limited v Benson

[2013] UKSC 14

as the Respondents have suffered no prejudice and unconditional dispensation should be granted. The Tenants/Respondents’ case

[5]None of the tenants/respondents responded to the application. The Law

[6]Section 20ZA is set out in the appendix to this decision. The Tribunal has discretion to grant dispensation when it considers it reasonable to do so. In addition, the Supreme Court Judgment in Daejan Investments Limited v Benson and Others

[2013] UKSC 14

empowers the Tribunal to grant dispensation on terms or subject to conditions. Findings

[7]The Tribunal finds that the applicant has acted reasonably in dealing with this urgent disrepair and it notes that that none of the tenants have objected to the application. Therefore dispensation under section 20ZA is granted unconditionally in respect of the consultation requirements for these works.

[8]However, this decision has no bearing on the question of the reasonableness of costs to be incurred or their payability. The Tribunal makes no findings in relation to those matters. C Norman FRICS Valuer Chairman 9 May 2022 Schedule of Lessees Miss K Y A Lau Mr M R Adam Mr S Poroku Miss L Coles Mr K Ahmed Mr D Thompson Lakeview Homes Five Limited Mrs A Farinas Miss C J McInnes Mr M Davis Ms L Wright ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL• The Tribunal is required to set out rights of appeal against its decisions by virtue of the rule 36 (2)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and these are set out below.

• If a party wishes to appeal against this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

• The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

• If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

• The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property, and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Appendix Section 20ZA Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (1)Where an application is made to [the appropriate Tribunal] for a determination to dispense with all or any of the consultation requirements in relation to any qualifying works or qualifying long term agreement, the Tribunal may make the determination if satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the requirements. (2)In section 20 and this section— “qualifying works” means works on a building or any other premises, and “qualifying long term agreement” means (subject to subsection (3)) an agreement entered into, by or on behalf of the landlord or a superior landlord, for a term of more than twelve months. (3)The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that an agreement is not a qualifying long term agreement— (a)if it is an agreement of a description prescribed by the regulations, or (b)in any circumstances so prescribed. (4)In section 20 and this section “the consultation requirements” means requirements prescribed by regulations made by the Secretary of State. (5)Regulations under subsection (4) may in particular include provision requiring the landlord— (a)to provide details of proposed works or agreements to tenants or the recognised tenants’ association representing them, (b)to obtain estimates for proposed works or agreements, (c)to invite tenants or the recognised tenants’ association to propose the names of persons from whom the landlord should try to obtain other estimates, (d)to have regard to observations made by tenants or the recognised tenants’ association in relation to proposed works or agreements and estimates, and (e)to give reasons in prescribed circumstances for carrying out works or entering into agreements. (6)Regulations under section 20 or this section— (a)may make provision generally or only in relation to specific cases, and (b)may make different provision for different purposes. (7)Regulations under section 20 or this section shall be made by statutory instrument which shall be subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.