25B Calais Street, London SE5 9LP LON/00AY/HMF/2025/0658

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No LON/00AY/HMF/2025/0658
Curtis WorrellApplicantMathew HolkerRespondent
Judge Adrian JackRachael Kershaw MCIEHNone for the ApplicantNone Application for a rent repayment order by tenant for the RespondentDate 15 August 2025Property: 25B Calais Street, London SE5 9LPType of application: Sections 40, 41, 43, & 44 of the Housing and Planning Act 2016 Judge Adrian Jack, Tribunal Member

DECISION

[1]By an application received by the Tribunal on 6th January 2025, the applicant tenant seeks a rent repayment order. The Tribunal gave directions on 5th March 2025. The applicant was extremely late in serving his bundle of documents, but the matter was nonetheless able to proceed to a hearing on 15th August 2025.[2]The applicant’s case is that he was a tenant at 25B Calais St from 2013. On 1st December 2021, he says, the London Borough of Lambeth, where the property is situated, introduced an additional licensing requirement for the whole of the borough, so that houses in multiple occupation with more than two occupants forming two or more separate households required a licence.[3]He gives the following history in the document at the last page of his bundle. On 1st December 2021, there were three occupants of the flat: himself, Baolinh Nguyen and Natalia Boteva. Ms Nguyen left the property on 1st March 2023. Ms Boteva left on 1st May 2023. On 1st April 2023 Natalia Barrenha moved into the property and remained there until 1st December 2023. On 1st May 2023 Sofia Jaskowsky moved in and stayed until 1st February 2024. Thereafter the applicant occupied the property on his own until he moved out on 12th July 2024.[4]The respondent has adduced a witness statement dated 8th June 2025 from Ms Jaskowsky which says: “01 This statement is to confirm that I, Sofia Jaskowsky, am a former tenant of Holker Mansions Limited. I was resident at 25B Calais Street, Camberwell, London SE5 9LP from 10th June 2023 and I moved out on 19th February 2024. 02 For the last two months of my tenancy, 20th December 2023 to 19th February 2024, the only tenants in the property were myself and Curtis Worrell.”[5]It can be seen that there are issues as to the precise dates. Indeed the applicant candidly admitted to us that he was not certain about precise dates. However, it was common ground between the parties that in January and part of February 2024 the only occupiers of the property were the applicant and Ms Jaskowsky. There was therefore in January 2024 and subsequently no licensing requirement.[6]In order for the Tribunal to have jurisdiction to make a rent repayment order, section 41(2)(b) of the Housing and Planning Act 2016 requires that “the offence was committed in the period of 12 months ending with the day on which the application is made.” In the current case, by January 2024 any offence under section 72(1) of the Housing Act 2004 had ended. The Tribunal accordingly has no jurisdiction to make a rent repayment order.[7]We should add that the respondent had a great many further points which he wished to make in defence of the application against him. In the light of our conclusion as to our jurisdiction, it is inappropriate for us to determine these issues and we do not do so.[8]The Tribunal has a discretion as to the fees payable to the Tribunal. In the light of our determination in our judgment the applicant should bear these costs. DETERMINATION(1) The Tribunal declines to make a rent repayment order.(2) No order for costs. Name: Judge Adrian Jack Date: 15th August 2025 Appendix of Relevant Legislation Housing Act 2004 72 Offences in relation to licensing of HMOs (1) A person commits an offence if he is a person having control of or managing an HMO which is required to be licensed under this Part (see section 61(1)) but is not so licensed. Housing and Planning Act 2016 40 Introduction and key definitions (1) This Chapter confers power on the First-tier Tribunal to make a rent repayment order where a landlord and committed an offence to which this Chapter applies. (2) A rent repayment order is an order requiring the landlord under a tenancy of housing in England to – (a) repay an amount of rent paid by a tenant, or (b) pay a local housing authority an amount in respect of a relevant award of universal credit paid (to any person) in respect of rent under the tenancy.(3) A reference to “an offence to which this Chapter applies” is to an offence, of a description specified in the table, that is committed by a landlord in relation to housing in England let to that landlord… [The tables of offences includes:] Housing Act 2004… section 72(1) control or management of unlicensed HMO 41 Application for rent repayment order (1) A tenant or a local housing authority may apply to the First-tier Tribunal for a rent repayment order against a person who has committed an offence to which this Chapter applies. (2) A tenant may apply for a rent repayment order only if – (a) the offence relates to housing that, at the time of the offence, was let to the tenant, and (b) the offence was committed in the period of 12 months ending with the day on which the application is made. 43 Making of a rent repayment order (1) The First-tier Tribunal may make a rent repayment order if satisfied, beyond reasonable doubt, that a landlord has committed an offence to which this Chapter applies (whether or not the landlord had been convicted). (2) A rent repayment order under this section may be made only on an application under section 41.