CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
Flat 43 Henry House, Coin Street, London SE1 8YE LON/00AY/F77/2025/0150
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
LON/00AY/F77/2025/0150
Between
Mrs K Mitchell
Applicant
Edward Henry Housing Co-Operative
Respondent
Mrs K Mitchell
Tenant
Before
Mr D Jagger MRICS
Date
15 October 2025
Property: Flat 43 Henry House, Coin Street, London, SE1 8YE
DECISION
The sum of
£168
per calendar week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from
15 October 2025
, being the date, the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the
Rent Act 1977
.
[2]
In essence, this was an objection on behalf of the Landlord in connection with the amount attributable to services in the Rent Register and this matter will be considered in the decision below.
[3]
The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection.to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. The Tribunal considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and the Rent Officer with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps. Evidence
[4]
The Tribunal did not receive completed Reply Statements from the parties nor any comparable evidence of rental levels in the area. The Tribunal had before it, the Rent Officers two Registrations and calculations for the most recent registration on the
10 January 2024
to take effect on that date. Determination and Valuation
[5]
Having consideration of the Landlords evidence and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Waterloo area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of
£600
per week. (
£2,600
per month) From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: Terms of tenancy agreement, no white goods, no carpets or curtains. This equates to approximately 20%
[6]
The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity at 20%
[7]
The full valuation is shown below: Market Rent
£600
pw Less approx. 20%
£120
3
£480
Less Scarcity approx. 20%
£96
£384
pw Decision
[8]
The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was
£384
per calendar week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
is calculated at
£168
per calendar week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.
[9]
In this case therefore the lower rent of 168 per calendar week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.
[10]
In a letter dated
20 November 2024
and subsequent email to the Rent Officer, the Landlord has made an objection in connection with amount attributed to service charges for the block which contains 66 flats. Based upon the service charge schedule the Tribunal agrees with the landlord and the costs for the lift are to be included. Therefore, the service charge cost for the property is
£19.31
per week. This is not considered a variable service charge and this matter is set out in the Tribunal’s decision.
[11]
It is often the case that market rents are in excess of those that maybe charged by social landlord’s as it is a significant part of their remit to provide affordable housing. As such depending on the type of tenancy agreement their calculation of rent is either at a percentage of market rent or by way of index. Comparison is made with the open market rather than limited to other properties which are offered by social housing providers. It is assumed that the landlord will by usual convention of social landlord’s not seek to increase the rent proposed in its original notice as a result of this determination. Chairman: Duncan Jagger MRICS Date:
15 October 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS 4 These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them