CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
Room 7, 98 Lexham Gardens, London, W8 9JQ LON/00AW/F77/2025/0297
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
LON/00AW/F77/2025/0297
Between
Wayne Finnemore
Applicant
Norsouth Properties Limited
Respondent
Wayne Finnemore
Tenant
Norsouth Properties Limited
Landlord
Before
Judge Shepherd and Carolyn Barton
MRICS
Date
12 February 2026
Property: Room 7, 98 Lexham Gardens, London, W8 9JQ
Type of application: Section 70, Rent Act 1977
DECISION
The sum of
£660
per month will be registered as the fair rent with effect from
12th February 2026
being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the
Rent Act 1977
. The rent challenged was
£750
per month from
9th September 2025
. Inspection
[2]
The Tribunal carried out an inspection. The room is within an impressive mansion block viewed externally from the front. Internally the block is considerably less impressive. The common areas are extremely tired and in need of modernisation. The Applicant’s room whilst large is desperately in need of attention and modernisation. His fridge is defective. The decorations are poor. The white good are in a poor state. He has suffered disrepair with the electrics as well as a leak from above. Most seriously he is an elderly man who is expected to use stairs to access a bathroom which is shared. This is because the landlord has not repaired the shower adjacent to his room. unal has carried out an inspection of the property on
13th February 2024
. Evidence 3.The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and landlord and its own inspection. Determination and Valuation
[4]
Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of
£1100
per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: Lack of repair/ need of modernisation – 20%
[5]
The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity -20%
[6]
The full valuation is shown below: Market rent
£1100
per calender month. Disrepair/modernisation -
£220
Less scarcity-
£220
per calender month Equals-
£660
per month 3 Add the services of
£91.50
The maximum fair rent is
£751.50
pcm Therefore the Tribunal determines a rent of
£751.50
per calender month. Decision
[8]
The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was
£660
per calendar month . The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
is calculated at
£898.01
. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of
£660
per calendar month is to be registered as the fair rent or this property. Chairman: Judge Shepherd
12th February 2026
APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them