CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
Flat 4, 58 Queens Gate Terrace, London, SW7 5PJ LON/00AW/F77/2025/0154
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
LON/00AW/F77/2025/0154
Between
Baron Van Bronckhorst
Applicant
Dorrington Residential Limited
Respondent
Baron Van Bronckhorst
Tenant
Dorrington Residential Limited
Landlord
Before
Ms S Beckwith MRICS
Date
2 July 2025
Property: Flat 4, 58 Queens Gate Terrace, London, SW7 5PJ
DECISION
The sum of
£21,275
per annum will be registered as the fair rent with effect from
2 July 2025
, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the
Rent Act 1977
. Inspection
[2]
The Tribunal carried out an inspection of the property on
2 July 2025
. The Tenant, Mr Van Bronckhorst, was present. The Landlord did not attend.
[3]
The Tribunal found the Property to be a fourth floor one bedroom flat with living room, kitchen, bathroom and separate WC. Evidence
[4]
The Tribunal has consideration of the reply forms submitted by the Landlord and the Tenant.
[5]
The Tribunal is also in receipt of information provided by the Rent Officer, which shows a fixed service charge of
£322.18
per annum. Determination and Valuation
[6]
Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of
£2,600
per calendar month.
[7]
The Tribunal were cognisant of similar sized properties in the area in superior specification buildings in the vicinity being let for in excess of
£3,000
per month. The rent of
£2,600
per calendar month adopted by the Tribunal takes into account the nature of the building, with common parts shared with the ground floor commercial tenant, the access to the Property being up four significant flights of stairs (no lift) and the issues of water pressure and minor cracking/staining.
[8]
From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to:
•
The Tenant having provided all white goods, floor and window coverings and other furnishings.
•
The scaffolding and netting surrounding the property, which affects the light entering and view from the property, as well as general inconvenience, including dust.
[9]
The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity. 3
[10]
The full valuation is shown below: Per calendar month MARKET RENT
£2,600
Less Tenant's provision of white goods, furniture, etc ) approx. 5%
£130.00
Scaffolding/netting surrounding building ) approx. 10%
£260.00
Market rent less deductions
£2,210.00
Less
£26.85
per month for services
£2,183.15
Less scarcity approx. 20%
£436.63
Market rent less deductions, services and scarcity
£1,746.52
Plus
£26.85
per month for services
£1,773.37
ADJUSTED MARKET RENT
£1,773
[11]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£1,773
per calendar month and this equates to approximately
£21,275
per annum. Decision
[12]
The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was
£21,275
per annum. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
is calculated at
£22,675.50
per annum. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of
£21,275
per calendar annum is to be registered as the fair rent for this property. Chairman: Sarah Beckwith MRICS Date:
2 July 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them