CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
112A Kensington Church Street, London W8 4BH LON/00AW/F77/2024/0201
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
LON/00AW/F77/2024/0201
Between
Ms Susan Griffiths
Applicant
Nuttoo Ltd
Respondent
Ms Susan Griffiths
Tenant
Nuttoo Ltd
Landlord
Before
Mr D Jagger MRICS
Mr J Francis
Date
20 September 2024
Property: 112a Kensington Church Street, London, W8 4BH
DECISION
The sum of
£21,840
per annum will be registered as the fair rent with effect from
19th September 2024
being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
Following an objection from the Landlord to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the
Rent Act 1977
. Inspection
[2]
The Tribunal inspected the property at around 12 noon in the presence of the tenant. The landlord’s representative was in attendance but did not enter the property. During the inspection the tenant’s brother and daughter explained the condition of the property and confirmed improvements made by the tenant over the course of the tenancy together with a number of associated damp and mould defects. The Tribunal explained the formula for the calculation of the maximum fair rent. The reason for the increase is that the formula is based upon the Retail Price Index (RPI) which has seen significant growth in the past 18 months due to rampant inflation. Evidence
[3]
The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions from both parties and the inspection of the property. The Landlord provided the Tribunal links with evidence of rental levels for comparable properties in the area. Determination and Valuation
[4]
Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Notting Hill area together with the Landlords comparable evidence, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of
£42,000
per annum. (
£3,500
per month) From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: the damp and mould to the main walls, no central heating, no white goods, no carpets or curtains, tenants improvements and terms of the tenancy which equates to approximately 35%
[5]
The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity at 20%
[6]
The full valuation is shown below: 3 Market Rent
£42,000
pa Less approx. 35%
£14,700
Terms and condition Leaves
£27,300
Less Scarcity approx. 20%
£5,460
Leaves
£21,840
pa
[7]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£21,840
per calendar annum Decision
[8]
The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was
£21,840
per annum. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
is calculated at
£28,930
per calendar annum The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of
£21,840
per annum is to be registered as the fair rent for this property effect from
19th September 2024
being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. Chairman: Duncan Jagger MRICS Date:
19th September 2024
APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of 4 how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them