8 Bulstrode Road, London TW3 3AT LON/00AT/OCE/2020/0178

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL

PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case No LON/00AT/OCE/2020/0178

Between

Mr Sunil Patel T D Footsteps Limited Tham UK PVT LimitedApplicant

Mr Jagat RamRespondent

Before

Mrs A J Rawlence MRICS

McMillan Williams Solicitors for the Applicant

Date 10 February 2021

DECISION

[1]The Tribunal determines that the premium to be paid for the freehold interest of the property known as 8 Bulstrode Road, London TW3 3AT (“the Property”) under the terms of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 is £104,250 to the Landlords excluding costs.

[2]The Tribunal confirms the form of the transfer document TRI for Title Number NGL 244344.

REASONS

[3]This application concerns a collective enfranchisement claim for the Property, which comprises an end of terrace house and grounds. The house has been converted into four flats; all of which are let on long leases. The respondent is the freeholder of the Property.

[5]The leaseholders of Flats 8A, 8C and 8D wish to acquire the freehold interest in the Property. The person to be served with a Tenant's notice claiming the right to acquire the freehold cannot be found.

[6]By the order (the ‘Order’) of Deputy District

Judge Tear in the Brentford County Court 5 November 2020 it was ordered that:

[1]Pursuant to Sections 26 and 27 of the Leasehold Reform Housing & Urban Development Act 1993 (the "1993 Act") the Court declares as follows:-a. On the date that this Claim is made the Property was a property to which the collective enfranchisement provisions of the 1993 Act applied,

b. On the date that this Claim is made the Claimants would not have been precluded from giving valid notice of the Claim under Section 13 of the 1993 Act.

[2]It is ordered that under Section 26(1) of 1993 Act that the freehold interest in the Property do vest in the Second Claimant (as the Nominee Purchaser and the party appointed by the Claimants) pursuant to Section 27(1)(a) of the 1993 Act on such terms as may be determined by the First Tier Tribunal pursuant to Section 27(1)(b) of the 1993 Act.

[3]It is ordered that. either a partner in the firm of McMillan Williams Solicitors as appropriate be appointed as the Designated Person for the purpose of executing the Transfer Deed (or such other person as the Court deems appropriate).

[4]It is ordered that upon payment into Court by the Claimants of the Appropriate Sum less the Claimants' casts of and occasioned by this Claim the Deed of Transfer in a form approved by the FTT shall be executed by the Designated Person and that the Designated Person shall deliver the original of the Deed of Transfer to the Nominee Purchaser.

[5]The proceedings be stayed generally to permit the FTT to assess value.

[7]The Valuation date is 16 July 2020 being the date of the issue of the claim. The Property

[8]The subject property comprises an end of terrace four storey property being 4 self-contained flats at lower ground, raised ground, 1st and 2nd floor levels.

[9]Each flat has hallway, kitchen, bathroom, living room and one bedroom.

[10]The property has off street parking for all flats at the rear.

[11]The First Claimant, Mr Sunil Patel holds flat 8A under a Lease dated 18 January 1985 for a term certain of 99 years from 29 September 1983.

[12]The Second Claimant, T D Footsteps Limited holds flat 8C under a Lease dated 6 March 1984 for a term certain of 99 years- also from 25 September 1983.

[13]The Third Claimant, Tham UK PVT Limited, holds flat 8D under a Lease dated 12 July 1984 also for a term of 99 years from 29 September 1983.

[14]The leaseholder of Flat 8B is not participating in the claim. Applicant’s Submissions

[15]Following the Court Order, the Tribunal is making a determination of the appropriate premium for the freehold interest under Title No NGL 244344 and form of transfer document.

[16]The Applicants provided a bundle to the Tribunal which included a valuation report prepared by Jonathan M Cooper BSc (Hons) MRICS of Michael Charles Chartered Surveyors dated October 2020 with a valuation date of 16 July 2020. Tribunal’s Deliberations

[17]The Tribunal considered the valuation of the Property and the assumptions and calculations made by Mr Cooper.

[18]The Tribunal noted a mathematical error in the calculation of the premium to be paid with respect of 8A. The existing lease value @ 80% relativity should be £176,000. The corrected marriage value is £32,434 with the Landlord’s share £16,217. The premium payable is £27,783 say £27,750.

[19]The Tribunal agreed with the valuations of 8C and 8D at £25,500 for each flat.

[20]However, the Tribunal noted that Mr Cooper had not valued the freehold interest in 8B. This flat is identical to Flats 8C and 8D and the Tribunal therefore determines its value at £25,500.

[21]The application is for the collective enfranchisement of 8 Bulstrode Road and the freehold interest in all of the property and not just the parts occupied by the three Applicants.

[22]The Tribunal determines the valuation for the freehold interest at: 8A £27,750 8B £25,500 8C £25,500 8D £25,500 = TOTAL £104,250 Right of Appeal

[23]If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

[24]The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

[25]If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

[26]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. A J Rawlence MRICS Chair 10 February 2021