CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
2 Prospect Cottages, London EN1 4QD LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0662
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
LON/00AK/MNR/2024/0662
Between
Mariama Turay
Applicant
Martin Brookes Estate Agents
Respondent
Mariama Turay
Tenant
Martin Brookes Estate Agents
Landlord
Before
R Waterhouse FRICS
Date
16 January 2025
Property: 2 Prospect Cottages, London, EN1, 4QT
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£2220.00
per calendar month with effect from
14 October 2024
. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
The Landlord served a notice under
Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988
which proposed a new rent of
£ 2250.00
per month in place of the existing rent of
£ 1650.00
per month to take effect from
14 October 2024
.
[2]
On
17 September 2024
under
Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988
, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on
17 September 2024
. Inspection
[3]
The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence
[4]
The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation
[5]
Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition/its current condition would be in the region of
£2400.00
per calendar month/week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: Photographic evidence submitted by tenant showing damp ingress along a lintel area.
[6]
The full valuation is shown below: per calendar month Market Rent
£2400.00
Less List any deductions damp ) 7.5%
£180.00
£2220.00
[7]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£2220.00
per calendar month. Decision
[8]
The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was
£2220.00
per calendar month.
[9]
The Tribunal directs the new rent of
£2220.00
per calendar month to take effect on
14 October 2024
. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. Chairman: R Waterhouse FRICS Date:
16 January 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. --- decision_2.pdf --- 1 Case Reference : LON/OOAK/MNR/2024/0662 Property : 2 Prospect Cottages, London EN1 4QD Tenant : Mariama Turay Landlord : Martin Brookes Estate Agents Date of Objection :
17 September 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the
Housing Act 1988
Tribunal : R Waterhouse FRICS Date of Summary Reasons :
16 January 2024
_______________________________________________ DECISION The Tribunal determines a rent of
£2220.00
per calendar month with effect from
14 October 2024
. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
The Landlord served a notice under
Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988
which proposed a new rent of
£ 2250.00
per month in place of the existing rent of
£ 1650.00
per month to take effect from
14 October 2024
.
[2]
On
17 September 2024
under
Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988
, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on
17 September 2024
. Inspection
[3]
The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence
[4]
The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation
[5]
Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition/its current condition would be in the region of
£2400.00
per calendar month/week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: Photographic evidence submitted by tenant showing damp ingress along a lintel area.
[6]
The full valuation is shown below: per calendar month Market Rent
£2400.00
Less List any deductions damp ) 7.5%
£180.00
£2220.00
[7]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£2220.00
per calendar month. Decision
[8]
The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was
£2220.00
per calendar month. 3
[9]
The Tribunal directs the new rent of
£2220.00
per calendar month to take effect on
14 October 2024
. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. Chairman: R Waterhouse FRICS Date:
16 January 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them