Room 5, 29 Vincent Road, Croydon CR0 6ED LON/00AH/MNR/2025/0911

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No LON/00AH/MNR/2025/0911
Magdalena LewandowskaApplicantMetta Logic Ltd.RespondentMagdalena LewandowskaTenantMetta Logic LtdLandlord
Mrs S Phillips MRICSDate 1 December 2025Property: Room 5, 29 Vincent Road, Croydon, CR0 6ED

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £700.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 August 2025. ____________________________________ SUMMARY REASONS 2 Background[1]On 28 June 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £750.00 in place of the existing rent of £550 per month to take effect from 1 August 2025.[2]On 31 July 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 31 July 2025. Inspection[3]Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence[4]The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation[5]Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £720 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: The maintenance of the garden.[6]The full valuation is shown below: per calendar month Market Rent £720 Less Garden Maintenance ) £20 £700[7]The Tribunal determines a rent of £700 per calendar month. Decision[8]The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a 3 willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £700 per calendar month.[9]The Tribunal directs the new rent of £700 to take effect on 1 August 2025, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. Chairman: Mrs S Phillips MRICS Date: 1 December 2025 APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AH/MNR/2025/0911 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Room 5, 29 Vincent Road Croydon CR0 6ED Mrs S Phillips MRICS Landlord Metta Logic Ltd Address 48 Ellesmere Drive South Croydon CR2 9EJ Tenant Magdalena Lewandowska[1]The rent is:£ 700 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)[2]The date the decision takes effect is: 1 August 2025 *3. The amount included for services is/is negligible/not applicable £0 Per month *4. Service charges are variable and are not included Date assured tenancy commenced May 2020 Length of the term or rental period Monthly[7]Allocation of liability for repairs As per the tenancy agreement.[8]Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Fitted wardrobes and bed.[9]Description of premises This is a large, converted house which is now a 7 bedroom HMO. Chairman Mrs S Phillips MRICS Date of Decision 1 December 2025 --- decision_2.pdf --- (c) Crown Copyright 2025 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AH/MNR/2025/0911 Property : Room 5, 29 Vincent Road, Croydon CR0 6ED Tenant : Magdalena Lewandowska Landlord : Metta Logic Ltd. Type of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mrs S Phillips MRICS Date and venue of Consideration : 1 December 2025 10 Alfred Place, London, WC1E 7LR Date of Summary Reasons : 1 December 2025 _______________________________________________ DECISION The Tribunal determines a rent of £700.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 August 2025. ____________________________________ SUMMARY REASONS 2 Background[1]On 28 June 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £750.00 in place of the existing rent of £550 per month to take effect from 1 August 2025.[2]On 31 July 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 31 July 2025. Inspection[3]Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence[4]The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation[5]Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £720 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: The maintenance of the garden.[6]The full valuation is shown below: per calendar month Market Rent £720 Less Garden Maintenance ) £20 £700[7]The Tribunal determines a rent of £700 per calendar month. Decision[8]The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a 3 willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £700 per calendar month.[9]The Tribunal directs the new rent of £700 to take effect on 1 August 2025, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. Chairman: Mrs S Phillips MRICS Date: 1 December 2025 APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. --- decision_3.pdf --- 1 Case Reference : LON/00AH/MNR/2025/0911 Property : Room 5, 29 Vincent Road, Croydon CR0 6ED Tenant : Magdalena Lewandowska Landlord : Metta Logic Ltd. Date of Objection : 31 July 2025 Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal : Mrs S Phillips MRICS Date of Reasons : 23 March 2026 _______________________________________________ DECISION AND REASONS The Tribunal determines a rent of £700.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 August 2025. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

REASONS

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 Background[1]By an application dated 31 July 2025, Magdalena Lewandowska, the tenant of Room 5, 29 Vincent Road, Croydon CR0 6ED (the subject property) referred to the First-tier Tribunal (the Tribunal) a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act).[2]The Landlord, Metta Logic Ltd., served a notice proposing an increase in the rent. The notice proposed an increase in the rent from £550.00 per month to £750.00 per month. The notice was dated 28 June 2025 and proposed a starting date for the new rent of 1 August 2025.[3]Neither party requested an inspection and the Tribunal was satisfied one was not required. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise. The Law[4]In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the 1988 Act, the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.[5]In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(2), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in sections 14(2) and (3) and any reduction in the value caused by a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Section 14 is reproduced at the end of these reasons. The evidence Tenant’s Submissions[6]The Tenant provided written submissions stating that the garden cannot be used due to it being overgrown and containing bees. The Tenant also provided screenshots of other listings for sole rooms ranging from £599 to £699 per month.[7]The Tenant confirmed that a bed together with built-in wardrobes are provided as part of the tenancy. Landlords’ Submissions 3[8]The Landlord provided details of the property confirming that it was a room within a 7-bed HMO with two bathrooms and three toilets.[9]The Landlord also provided links to other room listings demonstrating that £750 per month was the market rent and that on average a room in Croydon is £834 per month. Determination and Valuation[10]The Tribunal initially needs to determine what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. In doing this, the Tribunal will consider the rental value of the property but must not consider the personal circumstances of the Tenant, as that is not a factor envisaged by the Act.[11]Having considered the comparables provided by both parties together with consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £720 per month for the subject property as of December 2025 (the time that the Notice of Intention was issued by the Landlord).[12]Next, the Tribunal considered if there were any elements in the subject property that needed to be considered and reflected via adjustments to the market rent. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to the mould and no provision of central heating.[13]The full valuation is shown below: Per month Market Rent £720.00 Less Garden Maintenance ) £20 £20.00 £700.00 Hardship[14]Under section 14(7) of the 1988 Act, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix the starting date for the new rent from any point in time between the date set out in the notice of increase to the date that the rent is determined, if it appears to the Tribunal that the increase in rent would cause undue hardship to the tenant. 4[15]There were no submissions or evidence provided to the Tribunal substantiating a claim for hardship. Decision[16]The Tribunal determine that the market rent for the subject property is £700 per month. This is effective from 1 August 2025 being the date specified on the Landlord’s notice. Chairman: Mrs S Phillips MRICS Date: 23 March 2026 5 APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Any such application must be made within 28 days of this decision (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013. Any appeal in respect of the Housing Act 1988 should be on a point of law. ANNEXE Housing Act 1988 14.— Determination of rent by tribunal.(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to the appropriate tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the appropriate tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the appropriate tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (3A) In making a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a superior landlord is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the 6 dwelling-house forms part, the [appropriate tribunal] 5 shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. (3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act.(4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 , but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [, in respect of council tax] 6 or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements.(5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a superior landlord, the [appropriate tribunal] 7 shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne.(6) In any case where— (a) the appropriate tribunal have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the appropriate tribunal propose to hear the two references together, the appropriate tribunal shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before making their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection (1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference.(7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the committee may direct.(8) Nothing in this section requires the appropriate tribunal to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end.(9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.