Flat D 93 St James Road Croydon CRO 2US LON/00AH/LSC/2023/0052

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL

PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case No LON/00AH/LSC/2023/0052

Between

Sarum Properties LimitedApplicant

Abdul Raheem Nuhu and Cynthia NuhuRespondent

Before

Judge H Lumby

Mr S Mason BSc FRICS

Sampson Coward LLP for the Applicant

None Transferred Proceedings from County for the Respondent

Date 21 August 2023

Hearing 2023-08-21

Property: 2US

DECISION

[2]This has been a remote hearing on the papers, on referral from the County Court. A face-to-face hearing was not held because the Applicant served a request to the tribunal for consent to withdraw an application on 18 August 2023 as a result of which the hearing due to occur on 21 August 2023 was vacated. The decisions made are set out below under the heading “Decisions of the tribunal”. Decisions of the tribunal

[3]

(1) The tribunal consents to the Applicant’s request to withdraw its application for determination of the service charge for the years 2019 and 2020.

(2) The tribunal determines at the request of the Applicant that none of the service charges identified in the County Court claim numbered GOQZ5C2R the subject of the Order of Deputy District Judge Turner dated 12 January 2023 and transferred to this tribunal are payable by the Respondents.

(3) The tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 so that none of the landlord’s costs of the tribunal proceedings may be passed to the Respondents as lessees through any service charge.

(4) The tribunal makes an order under paragraph 5A of Schedule 11 to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 in favour of the Respondents that none of the costs incurred by the Applicant in connection with these proceedings can be charged direct to the Respondents as an administration charge under the Respondents’ lease of the Property.

(5) The claim is now transferred back to the County Court for final disposal.

REASONS

[1]The case has transferred from the County Court to seek a determination pursuant to section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (“the 1985 Act”) as to the reasonableness and payability of service charges levied by the Applicant on the Respondent for the service charge years 2019 to 2021.

[2]The Respondents are the leaseholders of the Property pursuant to a lease (“the Lease”) dated 28 October 1983 and made between Wavebrae Limited (1) and A.C. Philpott Esq (2). The Applicant is the Respondents’ current landlord.

[3]On 18 August 2023 the Applicant filed an application for permission to withdraw its application for determination of the service charge for the years 2019 and 2020. In its confirming letter, it confirmed that it did not require determination of the service charge, will waive the service charge that has been referred to be determined by the tribunal for the service charge years 2019 – 2020 and will not seek this against the Respondents and will not seek its costs in respect of the proceedings against the tenant

[4]As a result, the tribunal vacated the hearing scheduled to occur on 21 August 2023. As these are proceedings in the county court, it cannot of itself bring them to an end. Instead, it makes the decisions referred to above to give effect to the Applicant’s application and confirmations and now transfers the case back to the county court for final disposal.

[5]Name: Judge H Lumby Date: 21 August 2023 RIGHTS OF APPEALa. A. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office dealing with the case.

b. B. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.

c. C. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed despite not being within the time limit.

d. D. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.