Mrs M HopkinsApplicantThe Riverside GroupRespondentMrs M HopkinsTenantThe Riverside GroupLandlord
Before
Mr R Waterhouse BSc (Hons) MA LLMDate 25 October 2024Property: Flat 31 Burnt Ash Heights, Pike Close, Bromley, Kent, BR1 5PN
REASONS
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2[1]The decision of the tribunal is that a fair rent of £185.77 per week, including £59.24 per week for services, is determined with an effective date of 25 October 2024. Background[2]An application was made to re-register a fair rent, dated 28 November 2023, by the landlord of the property The Riverside Group, seeking a rent of £207.83 per week, including services of £59.24 per week. Prior to the application to re-register a fair rent, the Rent Officer had registered a rent of £154.06 per week, including services of £28.56 per week, with effect from 16 June 2020.[3]Subsequently the Rent Officer registered a fair rent of £183.60 per week, including services of £32.48 per week, with effect from 17 November 2024.[4]In an email the landlord objected to the rent registered by email letter dated 28 February 2024 and the matter was referred to the First –tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Residential Property).[5]Directions were issued by the Tribunal on 23 May 2024. Thereafter, the Directions made provision for the filing with the Tribunal of the parties’ respective written submissions and, in particular, for the completion of a reply form giving details of the Property and including any further comments the parties wished the Tribunal to take into account in making its determination. The tenancy is a statutory (protected) periodic tenancy. The tenancy (not being for a fixed tenancy of 7 years or more) is subject to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 which sets out the landlords statutory repairing obligations; the tenant is responsible for internal decorations. The Property[6]The property is as described by the Rent Register is a self-contained purpose built flat, modernised with full central heating, two rooms, one kitchen, one bathroom and WC. The Inspection 3[7]The tribunal did inspect the property and found a one-bedroom flat contained within a social housing multi storey block built around 1970s. The windows were double glazed, the property had central heating. The flat was located on the eighth floor and was accessible by lift. The flat was in good decoration , there were minor cracks in some of the plaster. The bathroom and kitchen were functional but had been installed several years ago. Relevant Law[8]Provisions in respect of the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the determination of a fair rent are found in Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9(1) to the Rent Act 1977, as amended by paragraph 34 of the Transfer of Tribunal Functions Order 2013, and section 70 of the Rent Act 1977. Rent Act 1977 Schedule 11, Part 1, paragraph 9 (as amended) “Outcome of determination of fair rent by appropriate tribunal[9](1) The appropriate tribunal shall- (a) if it appears to them that the rent registered or confirmed by the rent officer is a fair rent, confirm that rent; (b) if it does not appear to them that that rent is a fair rent, determine a fair rent for the dwelling house.” Section 70: Determination of fair rent (as amended) “(1) In determining, for the purposes of the Part of this Act, what rent is or would be a fair rent under a regulated tenancy of a dwelling house, regard shall be had to all the circumstances (other than personal circumstances) and in particular to- (a) the age, character, locality and state of repair of the dwelling-house, … (b) if any furniture is provided for the use under the tenancy, the quantity, quality and condition of the furniture [, and (c) any premium, or sum in the nature of a premium, which has been or may be lawfully required or received on the grant, renewal, continuance or assignment of the tenancy.] 4(2) For the purposes of the determination it shall be assumed that the number of persons seeking to become tenants of similar dwelling-houses in locality on the terms (other than those relating to rent) of the regulated tenancy is not substantially greater than the number of such dwelling-houses in the locality which are available for letting on such terms.(3) There shall be disregarded- (a) any disrepair or other defect attributable to a failure by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his to comply with any terms thereof; (b) any improvement carried out, otherwise than in pursuance of the terms of the tenancy, by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor in title of his; (c), (d) …[repealed] (e) if any furniture is provided for use under the regulated tenancy, any improvement to the furniture by the tenant under the regulated tenancy or any predecessor of his or, as the case may be, any deterioration in the condition of the furniture due to any ill-treatment by the tenant, any person residing or lodging with him, or any sub-tenant of his.”[9]Consequently, when determining a fair rent the Tribunal, in accordance with the Rent Act 1977, section 70, has regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the Property. It also disregards the effect of(a) any relevant Tenant’s improvements and(b) the effect of any disrepair or defect attributed to the Tenant of any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the Property. In Spath Holme Ltd v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc. Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and Curtis v London Rent Assessment Committee [1999] QB 92 the Court of Appeal emphasised: (a) that ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for “scarcity” (i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality 5 available for letting on terms- other than as to rent- to that of the regulated tenancy) and (b) that for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy (market rents) are usually appropriate comparables. (The rents may have to be adjusted where necessary to reflect any differences between the comparables and the subject property).[10]In considering scarcity under section 70 (2), the Tribunal recognises that:(a) there are considerable variations in the level of a scarcity in different parts of the country and that there is no general guidance or “rule of thumb” to indicate what adjustments should be made; the Tribunal, therefore, considers the case on its merits;(b) terms relating to rents are to be excluded. A lack of demand at a particular rent is not necessarily evidence of scarcity; it may be evidence that the prospective tenants are not prepared to pay that particular rent. Fair rents are subject to a capping procedure under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999 which limits increases by a formula based on the proportional increase in the Retail Price Index since last registration. The only exception to this restriction on a fair rent is provided under paragraph 7 of the Order where a landlord carries out repairs or improvements which increase the rent by 15% or more of the previous registered rent. Submissions Landlord[11]There are no submissions from the landlord other than the application form. Tenant[12]The tenant submitted a completed Reply Form received by the tribunal on 4 June 2024. The Form noted the Tenant requested an inspection but not a hearing. The property is located on the tenth floor and comprises two living rooms and one bedroom. The flat has central heating, double glazing supplied by the landlord. In 6 respect of curtains, carpets and white goods these are partially supplied by the landlord and partially supplied by the tenant. The Form notes the request that the rent to be assessed by a Fair Rent. The Determination Reasons for Decision[13]The rent to be determined must reflect the condition found on the date of the hearing disregarding all tenants' improvements.[14]The process for determining a fair rent is the application of Rent Act 1977 section 70 on the subject property and then comparison with the maximum rent permitted under the Maximum Fair Rent Order 1999. This means that comparison with other properties the subject of Fair Rent is not material.[15]Initially the Tribunal determined what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the Property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. Considering evidence submitted and the Tribunal acting in its capacity as an expert tribunal and using its general knowledge of market levels in the area, concluded that the rent was £1150.00 per month if let on a contemporary assured shorthold basis.[16]The Property is in the condition considered usual for a modern letting at a market rent, therefore, it is not necessary to adjust the above hypothetical rent. In addition, the Tribunal determined that there should be a deduction of 10% to reflect the fact the terms and conditions under the tenancy would differ from those of a contemporary assured shorthold tenancy, from which the rental comparables are derived. Additionally, a further 2.5% deduction for the tenant supplying some of the carpets curtains and white goods. Thereafter the Tribunal considered the question of scarcity in section 70 (2) of the Rent Act 1977. A figure of 20% was adopted. The calculation[17]The rent prior to adjustment the rent derived from the market is £1150 per month. Less 10% for terms and condition 7 Less 2.5% partial items supplied by the tenant deduction £143.75 per month Sub total £1006.25 per month Deduction for scarcity 20% £201.25 per month. Total £ 805 per month equal to £185.77 per week[18]The tribunal notes that the tenant is responsible for paying a service charge of £59.24 per week, a tenant would not seek to bid a level of bid derived from the market and then pay an additional service charge as in the contemporary assured shorthold market such a service charge would be paid by the landlord. The rent of £185.77 per week therefore includes the service charge of £59.24 per week. Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999[19]The rent to be registered is not limited by the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent Order) 1999. The rent calculated in accordance with the Order is £231.65 per week, including £ 59.24 per week. This figure is higher than the figure calculated by reference to the market rent with adjustments, of £185.77 per week, including £59.24 per week for services.[20]Accordingly, the sum of £185.77 per week, including for services of £59.24 per week is determined with effect from 25 October 2024 being the date of the Tribunal’s decision. Valuer Chair: Richard Waterhouse FRICS Decision Date: 25 October 2024 Extended reasons: 25 October 2024 Appeal to the Upper Tribunal A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Property Chamber) on a point of law must seek permission to do so by making a written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case which application must:a. be received by the said office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. 8b. identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the application is not received within the 28–day time limit, it must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for it not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.