CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
28 Charlton Road, London, NW10 4BD LON/00AE/F77/2026/0016
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
LON/00AE/F77/2026/0016
Between
Mr G D D Walker
Applicant
Notting Hill Genesis
Respondent
Mr G D D Walker
Tenant
Notting Hill Genesis
Landlord
Before
Mr D Jagger MRICS
Date
17 March 2026
Property: 28 Charlton Road, London NW10 4BD
DECISION
The sum of
£262.00
per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from
17 March 2026
, being the date, the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the
Rent Act 1977
.
[2]
The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection to determine this matter and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. The Tribunal considered this case on the Rent Officer with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps. Evidence
[3]
The Tribunal did not receive completed Reply Statements from the parties. The Tribunal had before it, the Rent Officers two Registrations and calculations for the most recent registration on the
24 October 2025
to take effect on that date. Determination and Valuation
[4]
Having consideration of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Harlesden area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good condition with modern services would be in the region of
£635
per week. (approximately
£2,750
per month)
[5]
Next, the Tribunal needs to adjust that hypothetical rent of
£635
per week to allow for Terms of tenancy agreement, no white goods, no carpets or curtains.
[6]
The Tribunal has considered very carefully the information provided by the tenant and the findings during the inspection. Using its own expertise, the Tribunal considers that a deduction of 15% (
£92.35
) should be applied in order to take account of the above matters. This reduces the figure to
£539.75
per week.
[7]
The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity at 20%
[8]
The full valuation is shown below: Market Rent
£635
pw Less approx.15%
£95.25
3
£539.75
Less Scarcity approx. 20%
£107.95
£431.80
pw Decision
[9]
The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was
£431.80
per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
is calculated at
£262.00
per calendar week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form.
[10]
In this case therefore the lower rent of
£262.00
per week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property.
[11]
It is often the case that market rents are in excess of those that maybe charged by social landlord’s as it is a significant part of their remit to provide affordable housing. As such depending on the type of tenancy agreement their calculation of rent is either at a percentage of market rent or by way of index. Comparison is made with the open market rather than limited to other properties which are offered by social housing providers. It is assumed that the landlord will by usual convention of social landlord’s not seek to increase the rent proposed in its original notice as a result of this determination. The Tribunal’s determination is the maximum fair rent. Chairman: Duncan Jagger MRICS Date:
17 March 2026
4 APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them