CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
9a St. Pauls Avenue, London NW2 5SS LON/00AE/F77/2024/0664
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
LON/00AE/F77/2024/0664
Between
Mr Jaymesh Patel
Applicant
Sovereign Network Group
Respondent
Mr Jaymesh Patel
Tenant
Sovereign Network Group
Landlord
Before
Mrs S Phillips MRICS, Valuer Chair
Date
30 January 2024
Property: 9a St. Pauls Avenue, London, NW22 5SS
DECISION
The sum of
£254.50
per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from
30 January 2025
, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the
Rent Act 1977
. Inspection
[2]
An inspection had been arranged for the property on
27 January 2025
as requested by the Tenant. The Tribunal attended the property at approximately 11.00am but after knocking on the communal door and attempting to use the intercom there was no answer from the Tenant. Whilst the Tribunal was in attendance the occupier of Flat 9b appeared and was able to let us through the communal door at which point the Tribunal knocked on the Tenant’s main front door. Again, there was no answer. A calling card from the Tribunal was left at the property.
[3]
Whilst in attendance at the property, the Tribunal were able to identify an intercom system that appeared to work intermittently and double-glazed windows to the front of the property. The main communal door was wooden as was the Tenant’s own front door. There also appeared to be off road parking available to the occupiers. Evidence
[4]
The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant. The Tribunal have not received any from the Landlord. Determination and Valuation
[5]
Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of
£500
per week. From this level of rent we have made the adjustments as shown below.
[6]
The full valuation is shown below: per calendar month Market Rent
£500
Less No White Goods ) 5% No floor coverings / curtains ) 5% Tenant’s decoration liability ) 5% Damp ) 10%
£125
£375
3 Less Scarcity approx. 20%
£75
£300
[7]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£300
per week. Decision
[8]
The uncapped fair rent initially determined by the Tribunal, for the purposes of section 70, was
£300
per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
is calculated at
£254.50
per week. The calculation of the capped rent is shown on the decision form. In this case the lower rent of
£254.50
per week is to be registered as the fair rent or this property.
[9]
We should comment that the rent fixed by the Tribunal is the maximum rent and the Landlord may not charge a rent above that figure. However, in many cases when the Landlord is a Registered Social Landlord, the rent charged may be significantly less than the rent fixed by the Tribunal. Chairman: Mrs S Phillips MRICS Date:
30 January 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them