CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
45a Brondesbury Villas, London, NW6 6AJ LON/00AE/F77/2023/0286
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
LON/00AE/F77/2023/0286
Between
Mr Martin Downing
Applicant
Notting Hill Genesis
Respondent
Mr Martin Downing
Tenant
Notting Hill Genesis
Landlord
Before
Ian B Holdsworth FRICS
RICS Registered Valuer 079475
Date
11 December 2023
Property: 45a Brondesbury Villas, London, NW6 6AJ
DECISION
The sum of
£445
per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from
11 December 2023
, being the date the Tribunal made the Decision. ____________________________________ © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
Following an objection from the Tenant to the determination of a fair rent by the Rent Officer, the Tribunal has made a determination under the provisions of the
Rent Act 1977
. Inspection and hearing
[2]
The Tribunal held a video hearing and then inspected the property. Mr Downing attended the hearing and the inspection. The Tribunal considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the Rent Officer and the parties, inspection and oral submissions at hearing. Evidence
[3]
There were written submissions from the Tenant. Determination and Valuation
[4]
Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in a satisfactory condition would be in the region of
£675
per week. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect any tenant improvements, disrepair and obsolescence at the property. Details of the adjustments made are shown in the valuation table below.
[5]
The Landlord has installed timber framed double glazed windows to this property since the last registration. This window installation was visible at inspection and the date of the works was confirmed by Mr Downing. This is a material improvement to the dwelling and it is the opinion of the Tribunal the that following completion of these works the property would achieve a higher rent. The Tribunal are told the previous window fittings were aged and damaged timber frames fitted with single glazing.
[6]
The Tribunal carefully considered the likely impact on rental value of the window improvement and deemed it would lead to a greater than 15% increase in achievable rent. Landlord improvements to a property that result in a 15% or more increase in rental value release the dwelling from the capping provisions of the
Rent Act 1977
and the
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
. Any rent increase is therefore not limited to an increase of 5% plus RPI.
[5]
The Tribunal has also made an adjustment for scarcity.
[6]
The full rental valuation is shown below. Details of the rental value with and without double glazing is provided: 3
[7]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£ 445
per week. Decision
[8]
The uncapped fair rent determined by the Tribunal [following the window???] , for the purposes of section 70, was
£445
per week. The capped rent for the property according to the provisions of the
Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999
do not apply. In this case the rent of
£445
per week is to be registered as the fair rent for this property. 4 Chairman: Ian B Holdsworth Date:
12 December 2023
APPEAL PROVISIONS You can only appeal this determination if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law. These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them