CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
18A Downs Road Hastings East Sussex TN34 2DX HAV/21UD/MNR/2025/0797
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
HAV/21UD/MNR/2025/0797
Between
Mr A & Ms J McKenzie
Applicant
Ms E Potter
Respondent
Mr & Mrs Antony & Jody McKenzie
Tenant
Ms Emma Potter
Landlord
Before
Mr I R Perry FRICS
Mr S J Hodges FRICS
Judge Cowan
None
for the Applicant
Date
12 December 2025
Property: 18A Downs Road, Hastings, East Sussex, TN34 2DX
DECISION
SUMMARY REASONS Decision On
12th December 2025
the Tribunal directed that a new rent of
£1,000
per month for the property should take effect from
26th October 2025
. Background
[1]
On
12th October 2025
the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under
Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988
which proposed a new rent of
£1,175
per month in place of the existing rent of
£930
per month to take effect from
26th October 2025
.
[2]
On
23rd October 2025
under
Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988
, the Tenants referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
[3]
On
4th November 2025
the Tribunal issued Directions clearly setting out dates for the parties to make any representation to the Tribunal. The Landlord was required to send a completed Statement to the Tribunal by
18th November 2025
and the Tenant was required to submit a Statement by
2nd December 2025
. Inspection
[4]
The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence
[5]
The Landlord’s Agent submitted a Statement dated
6th November 2025
and the Tenant submitted a Statement on
1st December 2025
.
[6]
On
5th December 2025
the Landlord’s Agent submitted a response to the Tenant’s statement. Given that this was outside the time set by the Tribunal, on
10th December 2025
the Tribunal e-mailed the Agent requesting a Case Management Application be filed by 5pm
11th December 2025
, this being the date immediately before the Tribunal’s decision. No Application was received.
[7]
In considering the papers provided the Tribunal first had to determine whether the Agent’s submission of
5th December 2025
should be admitted.
[8]
Given the facts that these papers were submitted outside the timetable set in the original Directions and that the Agent had not submitted the Case Management Application within the second date specified the Tribunal determined that it would not accept this late submission.
[9]
The Tribunal has considered the original written submissions provided by the Parties which had been copied to the opposing Party. Determination and Valuation
[10]
Having given consideration to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be
£1,175
per calendar month.
[11]
Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord.
[12]
In this case the property is not let in such condition so some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In particular the Tribunal has made the adjustments for the dated bathroom in disrepair and general wants of repair to include damp and mould issues throughout the property.
[13]
The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition
£1,175
Less deductions for:- Dated bathroom in poor condition
£50
General wants of repair, damp and mould
£125
____ TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH
£1,000
[14]
The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was
£1,000
per month.
[15]
The Tenant had requested that due to financial hardship the starting date for the new rent should be later than the date specified in the Notice.
[16]
Whilst sympathetic to the Tenant’s position the Tenant had not submitted sufficient evidence for the Tribunal to determine that the effective date should vary from the date specified in the Notice.
[17]
Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of
£1,000
per month should take effect from
26th October 2025
. APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. --- decision_2.pdf --- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/21UD/MNR/2025/0797 Property : 18A Downs Road Hastings East Sussex TN34 2DX Applicant Tenant : Mr A & Ms J McKenzie Representative : None Respondent Landlord : Ms E Potter Representative : Jack Charles Property Services Limited Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the
Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : Mr I R Perry FRICS Mr S J Hodges FRICS Judge Cowan Date of Application :
23rd October 2025
Date of Decision :
12th December 2025
DECISION HAV/21UD/MNR/2025/0797 SUMMARY REASONS Decision On
12th December 2025
the Tribunal directed that a new rent of
£1,000
per month for the property should take effect from
26th October 2025
. Background
[1]
On
12th October 2025
the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under
Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988
which proposed a new rent of
£1,175
per month in place of the existing rent of
£930
per month to take effect from
26th October 2025
.
[2]
On
23rd October 2025
under
Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988
, the Tenants referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
[3]
On
4th November 2025
the Tribunal issued Directions clearly setting out dates for the parties to make any representation to the Tribunal. The Landlord was required to send a completed Statement to the Tribunal by
18th November 2025
and the Tenant was required to submit a Statement by
2nd December 2025
. Inspection
[4]
The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence
[5]
The Landlord’s Agent submitted a Statement dated
6th November 2025
and the Tenant submitted a Statement on
1st December 2025
.
[6]
On
5th December 2025
the Landlord’s Agent submitted a response to the Tenant’s statement. Given that this was outside the time set by the Tribunal, on
10th December 2025
the Tribunal e-mailed the Agent requesting a Case Management Application be filed by 5pm
11th December 2025
, this being the date immediately before the Tribunal’s decision. No Application was received.
[7]
In considering the papers provided the Tribunal first had to determine whether the Agent’s submission of
5th December 2025
should be admitted.
[8]
Given the facts that these papers were submitted outside the timetable set in the original Directions and that the Agent had not submitted the Case Management Application within the second date specified the Tribunal determined that it would not accept this late submission.
[9]
The Tribunal has considered the original written submissions provided by the Parties which had been copied to the opposing Party. HAV/21UD/MNR/2025/0797 Determination and Valuation
[10]
Having given consideration to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be
£1,175
per calendar month.
[11]
Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord.
[12]
In this case the property is not let in such condition so some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In particular the Tribunal has made the adjustments for the dated bathroom in disrepair and general wants of repair to include damp and mould issues throughout the property.
[13]
The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition
£1,175
Less deductions for:- Dated bathroom in poor condition
£50
General wants of repair, damp and mould
£125
____ TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH
£1,000
[14]
The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was
£1,000
per month.
[15]
The Tenant had requested that due to financial hardship the starting date for the new rent should be later than the date specified in the Notice.
[16]
Whilst sympathetic to the Tenant’s position the Tenant had not submitted sufficient evidence for the Tribunal to determine that the effective date should vary from the date specified in the Notice.
[17]
Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of
£1,000
per month should take effect from
26th October 2025
. APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them