CaseNode API
Search
Explorer
Docs
Articles
Log in
Sign up
Flat 18, Barons Court, 100 Princess Road, Poole, BH12 1BP HAV/00HP/MNR/2024/0605
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No
HAV/00HP/MNR/2024/0605
Between
D Jones
Applicant
P Silvert
Respondent
Mr Deiniol Jones
Tenant
Mr Philip Silvert
Landlord
Before
Mr R Waterhouse BSc (Hons) MA LLM FRICS
Mr MJF Donaldson FRICS
Date
26 November 2024
Property: Flat 18, Barons Court, 100 Princess Road, Poole, Dorset, BH12 1BP
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£950.00
per month with effect from
1 October 2024
. ____________________________________ SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
On
5 August 2024
the Landlord served a notice under
Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988
which proposed a new rent of
£1150.00
per month in place of the existing rent of
£950.00
per month to take effect from
1 October 2024
.
[2]
On
24 September 2024
under
Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988
, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on
24 September 2024
. Inspection
[3]
The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence
[4]
The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. The Application Form from the Tenant stated the property is a first floor flat providing one living room, two bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen and garage. The Tenants Reply Form noted that there was no central heating and that the tenant had supplied curtains and carpets. The Tenant also noted that the landlord had replaced the shower in 2017, boiler in 2019 and new wiring in 2019. The Tenant submitted some comparables and proposed a figure of
£935.00
per month.
[5]
The Landlord in their Reply Form, noted four comparables in the block with carparking ranging from
£1100.00
pm to
£1210.00
per month. Determination and Valuation
[6]
Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition would be in the region of
£1250.00
per calendar month.
[7]
However, there are a number of aspects which differ or detract from a modern letting with a property in good contemporary condition. Deductions Lack of central heating
£100.00
Modern Kitchen inc white goods
£100.00
Tenants provision of carpets
£30.00
Tenants provision of curtains
£15.00
Damaged plaster and poor decoration
£55.00
----------
£300.00
per month
[8]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£1250.00
per month less
£300.00
per month giving
£950.00
per calendar month. Decision
[9]
The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was
£950.00
per month.
[10]
The Tribunal directs the new rent of
£950.00
per month to take effect on
1 October 2024
, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. Case Reference : HAV/00HP/MNR/2024/0605 Property : Flat 18, Barons Court, 100 Princess Road, Poole, BH12 1BP Tenant : D Jones Landlord : P Silvert Date of Objection :
24 September 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the
Housing Act 1988
Tribunal : Mr R Waterhouse BSc (Hons) MA LLM FRICS Mr MJF Donaldson FRICS Date of Summary Reasons :
26 November 2024
Date of Full Reasons :
23 January 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 _______________________________________________ DECISION The Tribunal determines a rent of
£950.00
per month with effect from
1 October 2024
. ____________________________________ Full REASONS The Landlord, Silverstone Properties Limited submitted an Application for Permission to Appeal a decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) dated
18 January 2024
. Such an application is premature given the full reasons for the decision have not been requested or issued. Valuer Chair Waterhouse has determined that the Application will be treated as a request for Full Reasons. If either party after the consideration of the Full Reasons wishes to appeal, the appeal provisions are recorded at the end of this decision. Background
[1]
On
5 August 2024
the Landlord served a notice under
Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988
which proposed a new rent of
£1150.00
per month in place of the existing rent of
£950.00
per month to take effect from
1 October 2024
.
[2]
On
24 September 2024
under
Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988
, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on
24 September 2024
.
[3]
Directions were issued to the parties on
15 October 2024
requiring the Landlord to submit their statement of case by
29 October 2024
and the Tenant by
12 November 2024
. The Directions also included a blank Reply Form for the parties use. Inspection
[4]
The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence
[5]
The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Applicant Tenant’s Submission
[6]
The Applicant Tenant completed a Reply Form dated
12 November 2024
. The Form confirmed the tenancy is for a flat comprising two bedrooms, one living room and a kitchen, bathroom with WC, a garage and access to communal gardens.
[7]
The Form notes there is Electric central heating, double glazing.
[8]
The Tenant noted that the Landlord had submitted a new shower in 2017, a new boiler in 2019 and new wiring in 2019. The Tenant notes there is no service charge.
[9]
The Reply Form detailed the defects in the property, the tribunal has considered these in detail but in summary they are; Living room – condensation within the double-glazing carpets pre-2007. Bathroom – dated suite and carpet, damaged ceiling from previous leak Kitchen – not built in and dated Master bedroom – cracking in plaster Second bedroom – cracking in plaster The heating in the flat is provided by a single storage heater in the hallway. The Tenant noted in the Reply Form that the carpets were provided by the landlord, the curtains by the tenant and the double glazing supplied by the LL. Also confirmed there were no white goods supplied by the landlord. The Tenant also noted in the Reply Form that they were aware of similar flats within a three-mile radius which rent between
£900
and
£970
per month. The Tenant also supplied several photos of the inside of the property which the tribunal has considered. The Tenant submitted some comparables and proposed a figure of
£935
per month. Respondent Landlord’s submission
[10]
The Landlord completed and submitted their Reply Form on
21 October 2024
. The Reply Form confirmed the property to be a first-floor flat comprising; two bedrooms, one living room, a kitchen, bathroom / WC. The tenancy has the benefit of garage and access to communal gardens. The Landlord's agent also noted “rent includes all works relating to the communal areas such as lighting, cleaning and gardening, and the property is located within a “five-minute drive to the train station and 5 minutes to bus stops.” The Landlords Reply Form is silent on who supplied the electric heating, the double glazing, carpets and curtains or the white goods.
[11]
The Form also notes comparables from which the Landlords agent draws comparison within the block or attached block on Poole Road. Flat 14 agent Palmer Snell – two-bedroom ground floor flat with garage with a rent of
£1200
per month let unfurnished. Flat 9 agent Palmer Snell two-bedroom flat, first floor, parking, let unfurnished at
£1200
per month unfurnished. Flat 12 A agent Winkworth two-bedroom flat, ground floor, with parking let at
£1100
per month unfurnished. Flat 4 agent Palmer Snell two-bedroom flat, ground floor, with parking let at
£1200
unfurnished. Determination and Valuation
[12]
Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition would be in the region of
£1250
per calendar month.
[13]
The comparables cited by the Landlord were given considerable weight because they were in the same block. The comparables given by the Tenant were useful from a contextual point but were gained from further away.
[14]
However, there are a number of areas of condition and specification which differ or detract from a modern letting with a property in good contemporary condition. Deductions Lack of full central heating
£100
Modern Kitchen inc white goods
£100
Carpets (poor condition)
£30
Tenants provision of curtains
£15
Damaged plaster and poor decoration
£55
----------
£300
per month
[15]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£1250
per month less
£300
per month giving
£950
per calendar month. Decision
[16]
The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was
£950
per month.
[17]
The Tribunal directs the new rent of
£950
per month to take effect on
1 October 2024
, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. RIGHTS OF APPEAL By rule 36(2) of the
Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013
, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). --- decision_2.pdf --- 1 Case Reference : HAV/00HP/MNR/2024/0605 Property : Flat 18, Barons Court, 100 Princess Road, Poole, BH12 1BP Tenant : D Jones Landlord : P Silvert Date of Objection :
24 September 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the
Housing Act 1988
Tribunal : Mr R Waterhouse BSc (Hons) MA LLM FRICS Mr MJF Donaldson FRICS Date of Summary Reasons :
26 November 2024
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 _______________________________________________ DECISION The Tribunal determines a rent of
£950.00
per month with effect from
1 October 2024
. ____________________________________ FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 SUMMARY REASONS Background
[1]
On
5 August 2024
the Landlord served a notice under
Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988
which proposed a new rent of
£1150.00
per month in place of the existing rent of
£950.00
per month to take effect from
1 October 2024
.
[2]
On
24 September 2024
under
Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988
, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on
24 September 2024
. Inspection
[3]
The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence
[4]
The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. The Application Form from the Tenant stated the property is a first floor flat providing one living room, two bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen and garage. The Tenants Reply Form noted that there was no central heating and that the tenant had supplied curtains and carpets. The Tenant also noted that the landlord had replaced the shower in 2017, boiler in 2019 and new wiring in 2019. The Tenant submitted some comparables and proposed a figure of
£935.00
per month.
[5]
The Landlord in their Reply Form, noted four comparables in the block with carparking ranging from
£1100.00
pm to
£1210.00
per month. Determination and Valuation
[6]
Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition would be in the region of
£1250.00
per calendar month.
[7]
However, there are a number of aspects which differ or detract from a modern letting with a property in good contemporary condition. Deductions Lack of central heating
£100.00
Modern Kitchen inc white goods
£100.00
Tenants provision of carpets
£30.00
Tenants provision of curtains
£15.00
Damaged plaster and poor decoration
£55.00
3 ----------
£300.00
per month
[8]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£1250.00
per month less
£300.00
per month giving
£950.00
per calendar month. Decision
[9]
The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was
£950.00
per month.
[10]
The Tribunal directs the new rent of
£950.00
per month to take effect on
1 October 2024
, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. APPEAL PROVISIONS These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA. --- decision_3.pdf --- 1 Case Reference : HAV/00HP/MNR/2024/0605 Property : Flat 18, Barons Court, 100 Princess Road, Poole, BH12 1BP Tenant : D Jones Landlord : P Silvert Date of Objection :
24 September 2024
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the
Housing Act 1988
Tribunal : Mr R Waterhouse BSc (Hons) MA LLM FRICS Mr MJF Donaldson FRICS Date of Summary Reasons :
26 November 2024
Date of Full Reasons :
23 January 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 _______________________________________________ DECISION The Tribunal determines a rent of
£950.00
per month with effect from
1 October 2024
. FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) 2 ____________________________________ Full REASONS The Landlord, Silverstone Properties Limited submitted an Application for Permission to Appeal a decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) dated
18 January 2024
. Such an application is premature given the full reasons for the decision have not been requested or issued. Valuer Chair Waterhouse has determined that the Application will be treated as a request for Full Reasons. If either party after the consideration of the Full Reasons wishes to appeal, the appeal provisions are recorded at the end of this decision. Background
[1]
On
5 August 2024
the Landlord served a notice under
Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988
which proposed a new rent of
£1150.00
per month in place of the existing rent of
£950.00
per month to take effect from
1 October 2024
.
[2]
On
24 September 2024
under
Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988
, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on
24 September 2024
.
[3]
Directions were issued to the parties on
15 October 2024
requiring the Landlord to submit their statement of case by
29 October 2024
and the Tenant by
12 November 2024
. The Directions also included a blank Reply Form for the parties use. Inspection
[4]
The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence
[5]
The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Applicant Tenant’s Submission
[6]
The Applicant Tenant completed a Reply Form dated
12 November 2024
. The Form confirmed the tenancy is for a flat comprising two bedrooms, one 3 living room and a kitchen, bathroom with WC, a garage and access to communal gardens.
[7]
The Form notes there is Electric central heating, double glazing.
[8]
The Tenant noted that the Landlord had submitted a new shower in 2017, a new boiler in 2019 and new wiring in 2019. The Tenant notes there is no service charge.
[9]
The Reply Form detailed the defects in the property, the tribunal has considered these in detail but in summary they are; Living room – condensation within the double-glazing carpets pre-2007. Bathroom – dated suite and carpet, damaged ceiling from previous leak Kitchen – not built in and dated Master bedroom – cracking in plaster Second bedroom – cracking in plaster The heating in the flat is provided by a single storage heater in the hallway. The Tenant noted in the Reply Form that the carpets were provided by the landlord, the curtains by the tenant and the double glazing supplied by the LL. Also confirmed there were no white goods supplied by the landlord. The Tenant also noted in the Reply Form that they were aware of similar flats within a three-mile radius which rent between
£900
and
£970
per month. The Tenant also supplied several photos of the inside of the property which the tribunal has considered. The Tenant submitted some comparables and proposed a figure of
£935
per month. Respondent Landlord’s submission
[10]
The Landlord completed and submitted their Reply Form on
21 October 2024
. The Reply Form confirmed the property to be a first-floor flat comprising; two bedrooms, one living room, a kitchen, bathroom / WC. The tenancy has the benefit of garage and access to communal gardens. The Landlord's agent also noted “rent includes all works relating to the communal areas such as lighting, cleaning and gardening, and the property is located within a “five-minute drive to the train station and 5 minutes to bus stops.” The Landlords Reply Form is silent on who supplied the electric heating, the double glazing, carpets and curtains or the white goods.
[11]
The Form also notes comparables from which the Landlords agent draws comparison within the block or attached block on Poole Road. 4 Flat 14 agent Palmer Snell – two-bedroom ground floor flat with garage with a rent of
£1200
per month let unfurnished. Flat 9 agent Palmer Snell two-bedroom flat, first floor, parking, let unfurnished at
£1200
per month unfurnished. Flat 12 A agent Winkworth two-bedroom flat, ground floor, with parking let at
£1100
per month unfurnished. Flat 4 agent Palmer Snell two-bedroom flat, ground floor, with parking let at
£1200
unfurnished. Determination and Valuation
[12]
Having considered the comparable evidence provided by the parties and our own expert general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition would be in the region of
£1250
per calendar month.
[13]
The comparables cited by the Landlord were given considerable weight because they were in the same block. The comparables given by the Tenant were useful from a contextual point but were gained from further away.
[14]
However, there are a number of areas of condition and specification which differ or detract from a modern letting with a property in good contemporary condition. Deductions Lack of full central heating
£100
Modern Kitchen inc white goods
£100
Carpets (poor condition)
£30
Tenants provision of curtains
£15
Damaged plaster and poor decoration
£55
----------
£300
per month
[15]
The Tribunal determines a rent of
£1250
per month less
£300
per month giving
£950
per calendar month. Decision
[16]
The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was
£950
per month. 5
[17]
The Tribunal directs the new rent of
£950
per month to take effect on
1 October 2024
, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. RIGHTS OF APPEAL By rule 36(2) of the
Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013
, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First- tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28 day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Case law
Browse all courts and tribunals
Search judgments
Explore the citation graph
Product
Home
Case Law Research for Lawyers
API documentation
Writing
All articles
The Legal AI Industry Is Solving the Wrong Problem
AI Hallucinations in UK Courts: The Cases, the Consequences, and How to Prevent Them