17 West View Cottage Lewes Road Lindfield Haywards Heath West Sussex RH16 2LJ CHI/45UG/MNR/2022/0084

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CHI/45UG/MNR/2022/0084
Between
Mr A JonesApplicantBradford Property Trust LtdRespondentMr Alan JonesTenantBPT (Bradford Property Trust) LtdLandlord
Before
Mr I R Perry BSc FRICSMr M J F Donaldson FRICS MCIArb MAEMrs A Clist MRICSGrainger PLC Tenant : Mr A Jones Representative : None for the ApplicantDate 7 September 2022Property: 17 West View Cottages, Lewes Road, Lindfield, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH16 2LJ

DECISION

[1]On 7th September 2002 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £950 per month to take effect from 20th July 2022. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 15th June 2022 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £975 per month in place of the existing rent of £925 per month to take effect from 20th July 2022. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]On 15th July 2022 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 25th July 2022 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations and that the Tribunal would seek to view the property on the internet. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[7]Mr Jones submitted papers to the Tribunal which had been copied to the Landlord’s Agent who made no representations to the Tribunal.[8]As stated in the Directions, as no objection was received from either party, the Tribunal determined the case on 7th September 2022 based on the documents received without an oral hearing. The Property[9]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet the property comprises a terraced house situated in a residential area on the northeast outskirts of Haywards Heath, about 2½ miles from the town centre. There is a full range of standard amenities within the town.[10]The accommodation provides a Living Room, Dining Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms, Bathroom with WC, Gardens to front and rear and an outside WC.[11]The property has double glazed windows but no central heating. The Energy performance rating is ‘F’. Submissions[12]The initial tenancy began on 25th December 2014 by succession from Mr Jones late mother. Mr Jones has lived at the property for more than 65 years, together with his brother.[13]Mr Jones states that the Kitchen is small and refers the Tribunal to an adjoining house with 3 bedrooms which is let £1,025.[14]Mr Jones further informs the Tribunal that he provided the white goods, carpets and curtains, that the bathroom and kitchen fittings are 24 years and 20 years old respectively and that he is responsible for internal decoration. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[15]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[16]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.[17]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgment and knowledge of rental values in the general area of Haywards Heath, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,300 per month.[18]However, the property is not in a condition that would command such a rent and adjustments need to be made to this ‘open market’ rent to take account of the condition of the Property together with Tenant’s provision of some white goods, carpets and curtains, dated Kitchen and Bathroom fittings and the Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration. The Tribunal decided that a further adjustment should be made to reflect the low EPC rating.[19]Using its experience, the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made: Tenant’s provision of white goods £30 Tenant’s provision of curtains £10 Tenant’s provision of carpets £30 Lack of central heating £125 Dated kitchen £75 Dated bathroom £25 Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration £30 Low EPC rating £25 ____ TOTAL per month £350[20]The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination[21]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £950 per month.[22]The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £950 per month should take effect from 20th July 2022, this being the date specified in the notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. --- decision_2.pdf --- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/45UG/MNR/2022/0084 Property : 17 West View Cottage Lewes Road Lindfield Haywards Heath West Sussex RH16 2LJ Landlord : Bradford Property Trust Ltd Representative : Grainger PLC Tenant : Mr A Jones Representative : None Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr I R Perry BSc FRICS Mr M J F Donaldson FRICS MCIArb MAE Mrs A Clist MRICS Date of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision : 7th September 2022 DECISION CHI/45UG/MNR/2022/0084 2 Summary of Decision[1]On 7th September 2002 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £950 per month to take effect from 20th July 2022. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to Sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 15th June 2022 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £975 per month in place of the existing rent of £925 per month to take effect from 20th July 2022. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]On 15th July 2022 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 25th July 2022 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations and that the Tribunal would seek to view the property on the internet. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[7]Mr Jones submitted papers to the Tribunal which had been copied to the Landlord’s Agent who made no representations to the Tribunal.[8]As stated in the Directions, as no objection was received from either party, the Tribunal determined the case on 7th September 2022 based on the documents received without an oral hearing. The Property[9]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet the property comprises a terraced house situated in a residential area on the northeast outskirts of Haywards Heath, about 2½ miles from the town centre. There is a full range of standard amenities within the town.[10]The accommodation provides a Living Room, Dining Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms, Bathroom with WC, Gardens to front and rear and an outside WC.[11]The property has double glazed windows but no central heating. The Energy performance rating is ‘F’. CHI/45UG/MNR/2022/0084 3 Submissions[12]The initial tenancy began on 25th December 2014 by succession from Mr Jones late mother. Mr Jones has lived at the property for more than 65 years, together with his brother.[13]Mr Jones states that the Kitchen is small and refers the Tribunal to an adjoining house with 3 bedrooms which is let £1,025.[14]Mr Jones further informs the Tribunal that he provided the white goods, carpets and curtains, that the bathroom and kitchen fittings are 24 years and 20 years old respectively and that he is responsible for internal decoration. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. CHI/45UG/MNR/2022/0084 4(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[15]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[16]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.[17]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgment and knowledge of rental values in the general area of Haywards Heath, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1,300 per month.[18]However, the property is not in a condition that would command such a rent and adjustments need to be made to this ‘open market’ rent to take account of the condition of the Property together with Tenant’s provision of some white goods, carpets and curtains, dated Kitchen and Bathroom fittings and the Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration. The Tribunal decided that a further adjustment should be made to reflect the low EPC rating.[19]Using its experience, the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made: CHI/45UG/MNR/2022/0084 5 Tenant’s provision of white goods £30 Tenant’s provision of curtains £10 Tenant’s provision of carpets £30 Lack of central heating £125 Dated kitchen £75 Dated bathroom £25 Tenant’s responsibility for internal decoration £30 Low EPC rating £25 ____ TOTAL per month £350[20]The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination[21]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £950 per month.[22]The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £950 per month should take effect from 20th July 2022, this being the date specified in the notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.