1st Floor, The Side Flat 32 East Cliff Folkestone Kent CT19 6BU CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0042

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0042
Mr E ChurchApplicantSeaside HotelsRespondentMr Edward ChurchTenantSeaside HotelsLandlord
Mr I R Perry BSc FRICSMs C D Barton BSc MRICSMr M J F Donaldson FRICS MCIArb MAENone Tenant : Mr E Church Representative : None for the ApplicantDate 15 June 2021Property: 1st Floor, The Side Flat, 32 East Cliff, Folkestone, Kent, CT19 6BU

DECISION

[1]On 15th June 2021 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £445 per month to take effect from 1st May 2021. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 15th March 2021 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £500 per month in place of the existing rent of £425 per month to take effect from 1st May 2021. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]The Tribunal received an application from the Tenant, dated 22nd April 2021, under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 11th May 2021 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[7]Both parties submitted detailed papers by the specified dates very clearly setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party. A Tribunal was arranged for 15th June 2021. The property[8]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet the property comprises a first floor flat within a four-storey building located close to the seafront on the east side of Folkestone. There is a bus stop nearby with main amenities within Folkestone.[9]The Landlord refers to at least three other flats in the building. The accommodation is described as including a Hall, Living Room, Kitchen, Bedroom and Bathroom and has the benefits of central heating, double glazing and a parking bay. Submissions[10]The initial tenancy began on 14th February 2009. The Landlord provides carpets, curtains and a cooker, having refurbished the property in 2008/2009. There is no mention of a fridge or washing machine.[11]The Landlord referred to rentals achieved for other flats in the building ranging from £450 per month for a one-bedroomed flat, to £500 per month for the garden two-bedroomed flat.[12]The Tenant stated that he had refurbished a utilities cupboard and informed the Tribunal of cracks to the rendering, wet rot to external window frames and problems inside his home with dampness to the Southwest facing wall. Photographs were provided to support this. The law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[13]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[14]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.[15]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Folkestone the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £500 per month.[16]However, the property is not let in a condition that would be expected in the open market. The Tribunal decided that this notional open market rent should be reduced by £50 per month and an additional £5 per month to reflect the lack of all normal white goods.[17]Accordingly, the notional open market rent of £500 per month is reduced to £445 per month.[18]The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination[19]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £445 per month.[20]The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £445 per month should take effect from 1st May 2021 this being the date specified within the original notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. --- decision_2.pdf --- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/29UL/MNR/2021/0042 Property : 1st Floor, The Side Flat 32 East Cliff Folkestone Kent CT19 6BU Landlord : Seaside Hotels Representative : None Tenant : Mr E Church Representative : None Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr I R Perry BSc FRICS Ms C D Barton BSc MRICS Mr M J F Donaldson FRICS MCIArb MAE Date of Inspection : None. Determined on the papers Date of Decision : 15th June 2021 DECISION CHI/29ULMNR/2021/0042 2 Summary of Decision[1]On 15th June 2021 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £445 per month to take effect from 1st May 2021. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 15th March 2021 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £500 per month in place of the existing rent of £425 per month to take effect from 1st May 2021. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]The Tribunal received an application from the Tenant, dated 22nd April 2021, under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 11th May 2021 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[7]Both parties submitted detailed papers by the specified dates very clearly setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party. A Tribunal was arranged for 15th June 2021. The property[8]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet the property comprises a first floor flat within a four-storey building located close to the seafront on the east side of Folkestone. There is a bus stop nearby with main amenities within Folkestone.[9]The Landlord refers to at least three other flats in the building. The accommodation is described as including a Hall, Living Room, Kitchen, Bedroom and Bathroom and has the benefits of central heating, double glazing and a parking bay. Submissions[10]The initial tenancy began on 14th February 2009. The Landlord provides carpets, curtains and a cooker, having refurbished the property in 2008/2009. There is no mention of a fridge or washing machine. CHI/29ULMNR/2021/0042 3[11]The Landlord referred to rentals achieved for other flats in the building ranging from £450 per month for a one-bedroomed flat, to £500 per month for the garden two-bedroomed flat.[12]The Tenant stated that he had refurbished a utilities cupboard and informed the Tribunal of cracks to the rendering, wet rot to external window frames and problems inside his home with dampness to the Southwest facing wall. Photographs were provided to support this. The law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. CHI/29ULMNR/2021/0042 4(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[13]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[14]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.[15]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Folkestone the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £500 per month.[16]However, the property is not let in a condition that would be expected in the open market. The Tribunal decided that this notional open market rent should be reduced by £50 per month and an additional £5 per month to reflect the lack of all normal white goods.[17]Accordingly, the notional open market rent of £500 per month is reduced to £445 per month. CHI/29ULMNR/2021/0042 5[18]The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination[19]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £445 per month.[20]The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £445 per month should take effect from 1st May 2021 this being the date specified within the original notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.