Flat 5 84 Sea Road Bexhill-on-Sea East Sussex TN40 1JL CHI/21UG/MNR/2023/0273

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CHI/21UG/MNR/2023/0273
Between
Ms S Antink and Mr F OakleyApplicantV PrasadRespondentMs Suzi Antink & Mr Fredd OakleyTenantVikash PrasadLandlord
Before
Mr I R Perry FRICSMr J S Reichel MRICSMr P E Smith FRICSNone for the ApplicantDate 24 January 2024Property: Flat 5, 84 Sea Road, Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, TN40 1JL

DECISION

[1]On 24th January 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £825 per month to take effect from 21st November 2023. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenants pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 16th October 2023 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £825 per month in place of the existing rent of £750 per month to take effect from 21st November 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]On 20th November 2023 the Applicants applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 1st December 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[7]The Landlord’s Agent submitted papers by the specified date which were copied to the Tenants. The Tenants made no further submission.[8]Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 24th January 2023 based on the written representations received.[9]These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing. However, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. The Property[10]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a 2nd floor flat within a 5-storey period building which is itself within a residential area close to Bexhill-on-Sea beach and railway station.[11]The accommodation is listed as including a Living Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms, Bathroom and WC. There is no outside space and on-street parking is permit only.[12]The Energy Performance Rating is ‘E’ and the certificate says the property has gas-fired central heating but no double glazing. Submissions[13]The initial tenancy began on 21st March 2020 at a rent of £750 per month.[14]Mrs Antink states that Mr Oakley no longer lives at the property but no new tenancy agreement has been made available to her.[15]The Landlord’s Agent states that carpets are provided by the Landlord but no curtains or white goods. The Agent also states that the heating needs replacing, “window extenders”, and some works are needed to the WC.[16]The Agent states that an almost identical flat in the same building was let in April 2022 for £825 per month and that the proposed increase is not unjust.[17]The Agent also supplied a copy of the particulars of the flat itself from when it was let in 2020 and of the comparable property that was let some 20 months ago. Both particulars included floorplans and photographs. Consideration and Valuation[18]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[19]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.[20]The starting point for the Tribunal is to assess the rental value of the property if being let in the open market. This would normally entail the property being in good order with carpets, curtains and white goods all included.[21]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties, associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Bexhill-on-Sea the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £900 per month.[22]However, the property is let with no curtains or white goods and the Tribunal is told that the heating needs replacing.[23]Using its experience the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made: Tenants’ provision of white goods £30 Tenants’ provision of curtains £20 Dated heating £25 ____ TOTAL per month £75[24]The Tenants made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenants undue hardship. Determination[25]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £825 per month.[26]The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £825 per month should take effect from 21st November 2023 this being the date specified in the notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. --- decision_2.pdf --- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/21UG/MNR/2023/0273 Property : Flat 5 84 Sea Road Bexhill-on-Sea East Sussex TN40 1JL Applicant Tenants : Ms S Antink and Mr F Oakley Representative : None Respondent Landlord : V Prasad Representative : Oakfield PM Limited Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr I R Perry FRICS Mr J S Reichel MRICS Mr P E Smith FRICS Date of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision : 24th January 2024 DECISION CHI/21UG/MNR/2023/0273 2 Summary of Decision[1]On 24th January 2024 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £825 per month to take effect from 21st November 2023. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenants pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 16th October 2023 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £825 per month in place of the existing rent of £750 per month to take effect from 21st November 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]On 20th November 2023 the Applicants applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 1st December 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[7]The Landlord’s Agent submitted papers by the specified date which were copied to the Tenants. The Tenants made no further submission.[8]Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 24th January 2023 based on the written representations received.[9]These reasons address in summary form the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing. However, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be CHI/21UG/MNR/2023/0273 3 expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. CHI/21UG/MNR/2023/0273 4 The Property[10]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a 2nd floor flat within a 5-storey period building which is itself within a residential area close to Bexhill-on-Sea beach and railway station.[11]The accommodation is listed as including a Living Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms, Bathroom and WC. There is no outside space and on-street parking is permit only.[12]The Energy Performance Rating is ‘E’ and the certificate says the property has gas-fired central heating but no double glazing. Submissions[13]The initial tenancy began on 21st March 2020 at a rent of £750 per month.[14]Mrs Antink states that Mr Oakley no longer lives at the property but no new tenancy agreement has been made available to her.[15]The Landlord’s Agent states that carpets are provided by the Landlord but no curtains or white goods. The Agent also states that the heating needs replacing, “window extenders”, and some works are needed to the WC.[16]The Agent states that an almost identical flat in the same building was let in April 2022 for £825 per month and that the proposed increase is not unjust.[17]The Agent also supplied a copy of the particulars of the flat itself from when it was let in 2020 and of the comparable property that was let some 20 months ago. Both particulars included floorplans and photographs. Consideration and Valuation[18]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[19]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.[20]The starting point for the Tribunal is to assess the rental value of the property if being let in the open market. This would normally entail the property being in good order with carpets, curtains and white goods all included.[21]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties, associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Bexhill-on-Sea the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £900 per month. CHI/21UG/MNR/2023/0273 5[22]However, the property is let with no curtains or white goods and the Tribunal is told that the heating needs replacing.[23]Using its experience the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made: Tenants’ provision of white goods £30 Tenants’ provision of curtains £20 Dated heating £25 ____ TOTAL per month £75[24]The Tenants made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenants undue hardship. Determination[25]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £825 per month.[26]The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £825 per month should take effect from 21st November 2023 this being the date specified in the notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.