33 Dales Drive Colehill Wimborne Dorset BH21 2JT CHI/19UD/MNR/2023/0237

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CHI/19UD/MNR/2023/0237
Between
Mr A & Mrs C WalkerApplicantMr R CoakleyRespondentMr & Mrs Adrian & Catherine WalkerTenantMr Roger CoakleyLandlord
Before
Mr I R Perry FRICSMs A Clist MRICSMr C M Davies FRICSNone for the ApplicantDate 6 December 2023Property: 33 Dales Drive, Colehill, Wimborne, Dorset, BH21 2JT

DECISION

[1]On 6th December 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,250 per month to take effect from 31st October 2023. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenants pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 27th September 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,350 per month in place of the existing rent of £850 per month to take effect from 31st October 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]On 1st October the Tenants applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 1st November 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos. Neither party submitted papers to the Tribunal.[8]Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 6th December 2023 based on the Application received. The Property[9]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a semi-detached bungalow within a residential area on the eastern outskirts of Wimborne, about 2 miles from the town centre and conveniently placed for the A31.[10]The accommodation is said to include a Living Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms and a Bathroom. Outside there are gardens to front and rear, a Garage and Car Port.[11]The Energy Performance Rating for the property is ‘D’ and the certificate states that the property is double glazed and has gas-fired central heating. Submissions[12]The initial tenancy began on 31st March 2017 at a rent of £850. No rent increases have been implemented in 6 years.[13]In the absence of any further representations the Tribunal could only rely on its own knowledge of rental values in the general area of Wimborne. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[14]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[15]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.[16]Having carefully considered rental values for 2-bedroomed bungalows in the general area of Wimborne the Tribunal decided that an open market rent of £1,250 might reasonably be achieved.[17]The Tenants made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenants undue hardship. Determination[18]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,250 per month. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,250 per month should take effect from 31st October 2023, this being specified in the notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. --- decision_2.pdf --- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/19UD/MNR/2023/0237 Property : 33 Dales Drive Colehill Wimborne Dorset BH21 2JT Applicant Tenant : Mr A & Mrs C Walker Representative : None Respondent Landlord : Mr R Coakley Representative : None Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr I R Perry FRICS Ms A Clist MRICS Mr C M Davies FRICS Date of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision : 6th December 2023 DECISION CHI/19UD/MNR/2023/0237 2 Summary of Decision[1]On 6th December 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,250 per month to take effect from 31st October 2023. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenants pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 27th September 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,350 per month in place of the existing rent of £850 per month to take effect from 31st October 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]On 1st October the Tenants applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 1st November 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos. Neither party submitted papers to the Tribunal.[8]Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 6th December 2023 based on the Application received. The Property[9]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises a semi-detached bungalow within a residential area on the eastern outskirts of Wimborne, about 2 miles from the town centre and conveniently placed for the A31.[10]The accommodation is said to include a Living Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms and a Bathroom. Outside there are gardens to front and rear, a Garage and Car Port.[11]The Energy Performance Rating for the property is ‘D’ and the certificate states that the property is double glazed and has gas-fired central heating. Submissions[12]The initial tenancy began on 31st March 2017 at a rent of £850. No rent increases have been implemented in 6 years. CHI/19UD/MNR/2023/0237 3[13]In the absence of any further representations the Tribunal could only rely on its own knowledge of rental values in the general area of Wimborne. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and CHI/19UD/MNR/2023/0237 4 (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[14]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[15]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.[16]Having carefully considered rental values for 2-bedroomed bungalows in the general area of Wimborne the Tribunal decided that an open market rent of £1,250 might reasonably be achieved.[17]The Tenants made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenants undue hardship. Determination[18]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,250 per month. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,250 per month should take effect from 31st October 2023, this being specified in the notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently. CHI/19UD/MNR/2023/0237 5[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.