Room 5, 30 St. Ronans Road, Southsea, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO4 0PT CHI/00MR/MNR/2024/0039

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CHI/00MR/MNR/2024/0039
Mrs Fiona SmytheApplicantS Properties Limited c/o Abbotts Langley Nominee LtdRespondentMrs Fiona SmytheTenantS Properties LimitedLandlord
Mr D Jagger MRICSMr S Hodges FRICSMr K Ridgeway MRICSNone for the ApplicantDate 31 May 2024Property: Room 5, 30 St. Ronans Road, Southsea, Portsmouth, Hampshire, PO4 0PT

DECISION

Decision of the tribunal (1) The Tribunal determines that the rent that the property in its current condition as at the 1st March 2024 might reasonably be expected to achieve in the open market under an assured periodic tenancy is £700 per month Background[1]The tenant has lived in the property as assured periodic tenant since 1st September 2023 with a tenancy agreement of the same date. The Tenant states that he has lived at the property for approximately three years.[2]On the 1st January 2024 the Landlord served a notice pursuant to section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 seeking to increase the rent from £680 per month to £700 per month, being an increase of £20 effective from 1st March 2024.[3]By an application dated 3oth January 2024, the Tenant referred that Notice to the Tribunal for a determination of the market rent. The Tribunal issued Directions for the conduct of the matter on 5th March 2024.[4]On the 28th March 2024 the Landlord made a Case Management Application requesting a two day extension of time, as he was on holiday abroad. This request was considered reasonable and was granted by the Tribunal.[5]The Tribunal considered the matter suitable for a determination on the papers and therefore a hearing was not necessary. The parties did not disagree with this arrangement. The Evidence[6]The Tribunal has before it a bundle of evidence which includes a background to the case, the application, the Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement and the directions. The Landlord and the Tenant each completed the Rent Appeal Statements with photographs. In her comprehensive submissions the Tenant provided comparable evidence of similar rooms in the area. Inspection[7]The Tribunal did not inspect the property and relied on the information provided by the parties, Rightmove, Google Street Maps and its expert knowledge. The property is a second-floor room with shower room forming part of a three storey Victorian semi detached house with shared kitchen and living room which has been converted to a 6 room HMO and two separate flats. The property is located in an established road with access to town centre amenities.[8]The accommodation comprises: 0ne room and shower room, there is electric central heating and windows are double glazed. Small communal garden area. It is stated curtains and white goods were provided by the Landlord. There is a shared kitchen and living room on each floor. The Law[9]The rules governing a determination are set out in section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. In particular, the Tribunal is to determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy, subject to disregards in relation to the nature of the tenancy (i.e. it being granted to a “sitting tenant”) and any increase or reduction in the value due to the tenant’s improvements or failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy. In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Tribunal has proceeded on the basis that the landlord is responsible for repairs to the structure, exterior and any installations pursuant to section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the tenant for interior decoration. The Valuation[10]Having carefully considered all the evidence from the Landlord and the Tenant the Tribunal considers that an achievable rent for the property in a good marketable condition with reasonably modern kitchen and shower room fittings, modern services with carpets curtains and white goods provided by the Landlord would be £750 per month inclusive of services and council tax. This figure is based upon the comparable evidence provided by the Tenant and the Tribunal’s professional judgement and experience. 11 The Tribunal has considered carefully the parties’ submissions and using its own expertise, we consider a deduction of £50 should be applied to take into account the condition of the room and the intermittent lack of hot water. This reduces the rental figure to £700 per month. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based on capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.[12]The Tribunal has been provided with a copy of the tenancy agreement, which incorporates the usual repair obligations.[13]The Tribunal received no evidence of hardship from the tenant and, therefore, the rent determined by the tribunal is to take effect from 1st March 2024. Rights of appeal By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the regional office which has been dealing with the case. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the regional office within 28 days after the tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. If the tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).