21 Chaffinch Close, Chatham, Kent, ME5 7RG CHI/00LC/MNR/2021/0095

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CHI/00LC/MNR/2021/0095
Between
S BeavisApplicantH SykesRespondentMr Sasha BeavisTenantMr Harvey SykesLandlord
Before
Mr W H Gater FRICS MCIArb (Chair)Miss C D Barton BSc MRICSMr P Smith BSc FRICS IRRVEvergreen Residential Property Services Tenant : S Beavis Representative : - for the ApplicantDate 17 November 2021Property: 21 Chaffinch Close, Chatham, Kent, ME5 7RG

DECISION

On 17 November 2021 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £700 per month for the property to take effect from 15 August 2021. Background[1]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[2]The Landlord’s Agent served a notice dated 25 May 2021, under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £700 per month in place of the existing rent of £450 per month to take effect from 15 August 2021.[3]On 13 August 2021 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[4]The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.[5]The Tribunal issued directions on 20 August 2021 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[6]Both parties made submissions as directed. The Landlord included photographs of the exterior and the Tenant provided photographs of the interior. The Tribunal found these very helpful.[7]The Tribunal convened to determine the matter on the papers on 17 November 2021. The Property[8]From the information submitted by the parties and available on the internet the property comprises a terraced house joined on two elevations otherwise known as a quarter house.[9]It is of traditional construction, built in about 1982 and situated on an estate in Chatham.[10]The accommodation comprises, on the Ground floor: Porch, Living room, Kitchen. First floor: Landing, Bedroom, Bathroom, WC. There is no garage but off-street parking is available. There are private gardens. Submissions[11]The parties concur that the property has double glazing, gas central heating and that carpets were included in the letting. They also concur that no white goods or curtains were provided.[12]The Landlord states that the fabric of the building is in good condition but that the interior, including the kitchen and bathroom, is poor. He points to issues regarding access to the property preventing carrying out of repairs and improvements.[13]The Landlord provided details of similar properties in the area that have been available to rent.[14]The Tenant states that the kitchen fittings and plumbing are poor and that some internal areas have not been decorated. Some flooring in the porch was replaced by the Tenant. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy - (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded - (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement; (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[15]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[16]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.[17]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the Chatham area the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £850 per month.[18]However, the property is not let in such condition as is usual. The Tribunal decided that it should make a number of reductions from this open market rent to take account of the fact that the Tenant provides white goods and curtains, and that internal fittings and condition are poor.[19]Using its experience, the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made: Tenant’s provision of white goods £20 Tenant’s provision of curtains £5 Poor condition £40 Dated kitchen and bathroom, general wear and tear £85 ____ Total £150 per calendar month[20]The Tribunal determined that the provision of a small area of flooring by the tenant would not have a material effect on rental value.[21]This results in a net open market rental value of £700 per calendar month.[22]The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause undue hardship. Determination[23]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £700 per calendar month.[24]The Tribunal directs that the new rent of £700 per month should take effect from 15 August 2021, this being the date specified in the Notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. --- decision_2.pdf --- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2021 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00LC/MNR/2021/0095 Property : 21 Chaffinch Close, Chatham, Kent, ME5 7RG Landlord : H Sykes Representative : Evergreen Residential Property Services Tenant : S Beavis Representative : - Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr W H Gater FRICS MCIArb (Chair) Miss C D Barton BSc MRICS Mr P Smith BSc FRICS IRRV Date of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision : 17 November 2021 DECISION 2 Summary of Decision On 17 November 2021 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £700 per month for the property to take effect from 15 August 2021. Background[1]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[2]The Landlord’s Agent served a notice dated 25 May 2021, under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £700 per month in place of the existing rent of £450 per month to take effect from 15 August 2021.[3]On 13 August 2021 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[4]The Coronavirus pandemic and considerations of health have caused a suspension of inspections and Tribunal hearings in person until further notice.[5]The Tribunal issued directions on 20 August 2021 informing the parties that the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[6]Both parties made submissions as directed. The Landlord included photographs of the exterior and the Tenant provided photographs of the interior. The Tribunal found these very helpful.[7]The Tribunal convened to determine the matter on the papers on 17 November 2021. The Property[8]From the information submitted by the parties and available on the internet the property comprises a terraced house joined on two elevations otherwise known as a quarter house.[9]It is of traditional construction, built in about 1982 and situated on an estate in Chatham.[10]The accommodation comprises, on the Ground floor: Porch, Living room, Kitchen. First floor: Landing, Bedroom, Bathroom, WC. There is no garage but off-street parking is available. There are private gardens. 3 Submissions[11]The parties concur that the property has double glazing, gas central heating and that carpets were included in the letting. They also concur that no white goods or curtains were provided.[12]The Landlord states that the fabric of the building is in good condition but that the interior, including the kitchen and bathroom, is poor. He points to issues regarding access to the property preventing carrying out of repairs and improvements.[13]The Landlord provided details of similar properties in the area that have been available to rent.[14]The Tenant states that the kitchen fittings and plumbing are poor and that some internal areas have not been decorated. Some flooring in the porch was replaced by the Tenant. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy - (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded - (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement; 4 (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[15]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[16]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Tenant are not relevant to this issue.[17]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in the Chatham area the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £850 per month. 5[18]However, the property is not let in such condition as is usual. The Tribunal decided that it should make a number of reductions from this open market rent to take account of the fact that the Tenant provides white goods and curtains, and that internal fittings and condition are poor.[19]Using its experience, the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made: Tenant’s provision of white goods £20 Tenant’s provision of curtains £5 Poor condition £40 Dated kitchen and bathroom, general wear and tear £85 ____ Total £150 per calendar month[20]The Tribunal determined that the provision of a small area of flooring by the tenant would not have a material effect on rental value.[21]This results in a net open market rental value of £700 per calendar month.[22]The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause undue hardship. Determination[23]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £700 per calendar month.[24]The Tribunal directs that the new rent of £700 per month should take effect from 15 August 2021, this being the date specified in the Notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision. 6[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.