35c Segrave Road Plymouth Devon PL2 3DR CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046
Between
Mr A L BallApplicantK J M Bruce & D D S BruceRespondentMr Alexander BallTenantMr Kirran Bruce & Mr Duncan BruceLandlord
Before
Mr I R Perry FRICSMr S J Hodges FRICSMr M C Woodrow MRICSNone for the ApplicantDate 4 May 2023Property: 35C Segrave Road, Plymouth, Devon, PL2 3DR

DECISION

[1]On 4th May 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £620 per month to take effect from 28th March 2023. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 23rd February 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £670 per month in place of the existing rent of £550 per month to take effect from 28th March 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]On 10th March 2023 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either specifically requested by the parties or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 31st March 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[7]Both parties submitted detailed papers by the specified dates setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party.[8]Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 4th May 2023 based on the written representations received. The Property[9]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises one of 5 first floor flats situated above a small parade of lockup shops about 1.25 miles north of the centre of Plymouth, in a mainly residential area. All main amenities are within reasonable distance.[10]The accommodation is described as including a Living Room with adjoining Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms and a Bathroom with WC. Outside there is a small terrace area and off-street parking.[11]Windows are double glazed and the accommodation has gas-fired central heating. White goods and carpets are included in the tenancy but curtains are provided by the Tenant.[12]The Energy Performance Rating is ‘E’, having been assessed on 31st August 2018 Submissions[13]The initial Tenancy began on 28th October 2015. The Landlord’s Agent states that the Landlord pays £60 per month service charge for stair access lighting and cleaning.[14]The main elevations were re-rendered in June 2016 to provide additional insulation. The flat roof was recovered in November 2021 with an additional insulating material.[15]The Agent states that the flat was refurbished some 7 years ago before Mr Ball took up occupation but accepts that the fittings have worn since then. She also states that she has compared the property with the cheapest rent for similar properties in the area.[16]The Tenant states that the rent paid for numbers 29a and 30a Segrave Road, both similar flats, are both £400 per month.[17]The Tenant provided the Tribunal with photographs showing black mould growth at points inside the flat and referred to problems with a roof skylight. He submitted text and email messages from January 2020 onwards referring to repair issues required, for which the Landlord appears to have granted a rent reduction whilst issues were resolved.[18]The Tenant also submitted photographs taken more recently which showed general disrepair including ‘blown’ windows, poor decoration and deteriorating kitchen cupboards. Furthermore, the Tribunal was supplied with photographs showing the broken lights to the external staircase, poor external decoration, the car parking area with overgrown weeds, fly tipping and likely rodent infestations. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[19]The Tribunal is required to assess the rental value of the property as at today’s date.[20]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[21]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.[22]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence, using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Plymouth, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £720 per month.[23]However, the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made to the ‘open market’ rental figure to take account of the issues raised by the Parties. Internal repair and condition £50 External repair and condition including common areas £50 ____ TOTAL per month £100[24]The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination[25]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £620 per month.[26]The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £620 per month should take effect from 28th March 2023, this being the date specified in the notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking. --- decision_2.pdf --- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023 FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046 Property : 35c Segrave Road Plymouth Devon PL2 3DR Applicant Tenant : Mr A L Ball Representative : None Respondent Landlord : K J M Bruce & D D S Bruce Representative : Ms Laetitia Wittock Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr I R Perry FRICS Mr S J Hodges FRICS Mr M C Woodrow MRICS Date of Inspection : None. Paper determination Date of Decision : 4th May 2023 DECISION CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046 2 Summary of Decision[1]On 4th May 2023 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £620 per month to take effect from 28th March 2023. Background[2]The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.[3]On 23rd February 2023 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £670 per month in place of the existing rent of £550 per month to take effect from 28th March 2023. The notice complied with the legal requirements.[4]On 10th March 2023 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4) (a) of the Housing Act 1988.[5]The Tribunal does not consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either specifically requested by the parties or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection and/or hearing.[6]The Tribunal issued directions on 31st March 2023 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.[7]Both parties submitted detailed papers by the specified dates setting out their respective cases. The papers were also copied to the other party.[8]Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 4th May 2023 based on the written representations received. The Property[9]From the information given in the papers and available on the internet, the property comprises one of 5 first floor flats situated above a small parade of lockup shops about 1.25 miles north of the centre of Plymouth, in a mainly residential area. All main amenities are within reasonable distance.[10]The accommodation is described as including a Living Room with adjoining Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms and a Bathroom with WC. Outside there is a small terrace area and off-street parking.[11]Windows are double glazed and the accommodation has gas-fired central heating. White goods and carpets are included in the tenancy but curtains are provided by the Tenant.[12]The Energy Performance Rating is ‘E’, having been assessed on 31st August 2018 Submissions CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046 3[13]The initial Tenancy began on 28th October 2015. The Landlord’s Agent states that the Landlord pays £60 per month service charge for stair access lighting and cleaning.[14]The main elevations were re-rendered in June 2016 to provide additional insulation. The flat roof was recovered in November 2021 with an additional insulating material.[15]The Agent states that the flat was refurbished some 7 years ago before Mr Ball took up occupation but accepts that the fittings have worn since then. She also states that she has compared the property with the cheapest rent for similar properties in the area.[16]The Tenant states that the rent paid for numbers 29a and 30a Segrave Road, both similar flats, are both £400 per month.[17]The Tenant provided the Tribunal with photographs showing black mould growth at points inside the flat and referred to problems with a roof skylight. He submitted text and email messages from January 2020 onwards referring to repair issues required, for which the Landlord appears to have granted a rent reduction whilst issues were resolved.[18]The Tenant also submitted photographs taken more recently which showed general disrepair including ‘blown’ windows, poor decoration and deteriorating kitchen cupboards. Furthermore, the Tribunal was supplied with photographs showing the broken lights to the external staircase, poor external decoration, the car parking area with overgrown weeds, fly tipping and likely rodent infestations. The Law S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy- (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded- CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046 4 (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely- (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit.(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation. Consideration and Valuation[19]The Tribunal is required to assess the rental value of the property as at today’s date.[20]The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.[21]The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue. CHI/00HG/MNR/2023/0046 5[22]Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence, using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Plymouth, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £720 per month.[23]However, the Tribunal decided that the following adjustments should be made to the ‘open market’ rental figure to take account of the issues raised by the Parties. Internal repair and condition £50 External repair and condition including common areas £50 ____ TOTAL per month £100[24]The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship. Determination[25]The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £620 per month.[26]The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £620 per month should take effect from 28th March 2023, this being the date specified in the notice. RIGHTS OF APPEAL[1]A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to rpsouthern@justice.gov.uk as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.[2]The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.[3]If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.[4]The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.