46 Thornton Street Hertford Hertfordshire SG14 1QH CAM/26UD/F77/2025/0030

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CAM/26UD/F77/2025/0030
Between
Mr M JonesApplicantHanover Property Trust LimitedRespondent
Before
Mrs E Flint FRICSDate 6 October 2025Property: 46 Thornton Street Hertford Hertfordshire SG14 1QHType of application: Determination of the registered rent under Section 70 Rent Act 1977

DECISION

This has been a hearing on the papers which has not been objected to by the parties. A face to face hearing was not held because, no-one requested the same and I determined that the matter could be dealt with on the papers. The documents which I was referred to were in a bundle the contents of which I have recorded. The registered rent with effect from 6 October 2025 is £250 per week. © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Background[1]On 21 July 2025 the landlord applied to the rent officer for registration of a fair rent of £255 per week for the above property.[2]The registered rent at the date of the application was £136 per week which had been registered by the rent officer on 12 July 2023 with effect from 24 August 2023.[3]On 21 July 2025, the rent officer registered a fair rent of £246 per week with effect from 24 August 2025.[4]The landlord objected to the registered rent on 4 August 2025.[5]The tribunal issued Directions on 7 August 2025. Written representations were received from the landlord, no response was received from the tenant. The Inspection[6]I inspected the house on 6 October 2025. It comprises a terraced house constructed in 1880 with small gardens to the front and rear. It is situated near to the river and within walking distance of the town centre, bus station and railway station. Thornton Street is a heavily parked street of late nineteenth century houses.[7]The structure of the house appeared to be in fair condition however the single glazed timber framed windows were in poor condition. Internally there were two living rooms on the ground floor and a kitchen in the back addition which had been fitted out by the tenant who had also installed central heating throughout. There was a double and a single bedroom and a small bathroom/wc on the first floor which was approached via a steep staircase. The tenant had replaced the bathroom suite and had the bathroom walls fully tiled. The Evidence[8]The landlord stated that the property was in good order throughout. The objection was due to the increase in rent being less than 5%. The Law[9]When determining a fair rent I, in accordance with section 70 of the Rent Act 1977, must have regard to all the circumstances including the age, location and state of repair of the property. I also must disregard the effect of any relevant tenant’s improvements and the effect of any disrepair or any other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title under the regulated tenancy, on the rental value of the property. I am unable to take into account the tenant’s personal circumstances when assessing the fair rent. 10.In Spath Holme Ltd v Chairman of the Greater Manchester etc Committee (1995) 28 HLR 107 and Curtis v London Rent Assessment Committee (1999) QB 92 the Court of appeal emphasised: That ordinarily a fair rent is the market rent for the property discounted for scarcity i.e. that element, if any, of the market rent, that is attributable to there being a significant shortage of similar properties in the wider locality available for letting on similar terms to that of a regulated tenancy, and That for the purposes of determining the market rent, assured tenancy market rents are usually appropriate comparables; adjusted as necessary to reflect any relevant differences between the comparables and the subject property. Valuation[11]In the first instance I determined what rent the landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition and on the terms considered usual for such an open market letting. As neither party provided any comparable evidence I relied on my own general knowledge of rents within Hertford and concluded that if the house were in the condition usually found on the open market it would let for £350 per week.[12]However, it was first necessary to adjust the hypothetical rent of £350 per week to allow for the differences between the terms and condition considered usual for such a letting and the condition of the actual property at the valuation date, ignoring any tenant’s improvements, (disregarding the effect of any disrepair or other defect attributable to the tenant or any predecessor in title). I determined that the hypothetical rent should be reduced by £60 to reflect no central heating, lack of modernisation, floor coverings, curtains and white goods and difference in terms and conditions.[13]This leaves an adjusted market rent for the subject property of £290 per week. I am of the opinion that there is substantial scarcity for similar sized properties in the commuter areas of Hertfordshire and Essex and therefore made a deduction of approximately 15% for scarcity. The uncapped fair rent is £250 per week.[14]The fair rent is the maximum rent the landlord may charge. Decision[15]The uncapped fair rent initially determined for the purposes of section 70, is below the maximum fair rent of £269 per week calculated under the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999. Therefore, the rent will not be capped under the provisions of the Order.[16]Accordingly, the sum of £250 per week will be registered as the fair rent with effect from 6 October 2025 being the date of my decision. Chairman: Evelyn Flint Dated: 6 October 2025 ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013, the Tribunal is required to notify the parties about any right of appeal they may have. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rppta-application-for-permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-landschamber The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. If the First-tier Tribunal refuses to grant permission to appeal, a further application for permission may be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).