51 Willoughby Road Langley Slough England SL3 8JH: CAM/00MD/MNR/2026/0076 CAM/00MD/MNR/2026/0076

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CAM/00MD/MNR/2026/0076
Mr Mohammed Chaudry and Mrs AfrasApplicantMr Palwinder Singh GillRespondentMr Mohammed Chaudry and Mrs Afras ChaudryTenantMr Palwinder Singh Gill 72 Stoke RoadLandlord
Ms S JohnsonDate 22 June 2026Property: Langley Slough England SL3 8JHType of application: sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 I R Perry FRICS

REASONS

[3]On 16th March 2026 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,250 per calendar month (“pcm”) in place of the existing rent of £1,800 pcm. Under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The most recent tenancy agreement commenced on 20th August 2024. Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.[4]The Landlord is responsible for repairs. The Property[5]The Property is stated to be a terraced house with accommodation including a living room, kitchen, 3 bedrooms and bathroom. There is a small garden. Evidence[6]The Tenants provided an application form for a market rent determination with supporting documents and photographs. The Landlord provided a landlord’s reply form 1A for market rent decision and the Tenant also submitted a reply to that form. The Tenant.[8]In their application form to the Tribunal Mr Chaudry states that “the notice is not legally sent as he sent only form 4 front page and nothing else with it where more guidance should be given so that I could challenge this. The agent sent the same form 4 page and he just sent the same thing just changed the number and signed himself and sent it through letter box, it not legally sent and does not make sense for this increase for a property that values lower plus the conditions of the house”. The Tenant provided the front page of the Landlord’s Notice with their application form to the Tribunal. 2 The Landlord[9]In his response to the Application the Landlord states that the Notice was sent in the post and submits a copy as Annex 5. Annex 5 is a receipt from the Post Office dated 16th March 2026. Determination[10]To secure an increase in the rent under a tenancy Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 requires a landlord to serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form. This form includes a front page detailing the amount of rent presently payable, the new rent and the date that a new rent is to commence. The prescribed form requires not only the front page but the accompanying statutory notes, which form part of the notice and must be provided to the tenant.[11]In this case, despite the evidence given by the Tenant which should have alerted him, the Landlord has not demonstrated that a valid notice has been served on the Tenant. While the Landlord relies on evidence of posting, that does not establish that the complete prescribed notice, including the required accompanying information, was served. The Tribunal must first be satisfied that a valid notice has been served before it has jurisdiction to determine the market rent.[12]The Tribunal concludes that no proper notice has been served and therefore strikes out the application.[13]The Landlord is at liberty to serve a fresh Section 13 Notice. APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal. 3