Flat 35, 3 Joseph Huntley Walk, Readin, RG1 3GW: CAM/00MC/MNR/2025/0803 CAM/00MC/MNR/2025/0803

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case No CAM/00MC/MNR/2025/0803
A Ralhan, AK Ralhan and R RalhanTenantHuntley Wharf Block W1 LimitedLandlord
Peter Roberts FRICS CEnvDate 25 May 2026Property: Readin, RG1 3GWType of application: sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

REASONS

[3]On 29 October 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,065 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1,950 pcm to take effect from 1 December 2025. On 19 November 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The assured tenancy commenced on 5 October 2024 for a term of 12 months at an initial rent of £1,950 pcm. The rental period is monthly. Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.[4]As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.[5]Not applicable Liability for Council Tax[6]The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive/inclusive of Council Tax. Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.[7]Not Applicable Inspection/Hearing[8]The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise. 2 The Property[9]The Tribunal relied upon information in the public domain and the Application Form as provided by the Tenant. It understands that the Property comprises a modern purpose built flat located on the third floor and providing 2 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 1 living room and a kitchen. Evidence[10]Neither the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms nor provided any submissions to assist the Tribunal. Determination and Valuation[11]In determining the market rent, the Tribunal has regard to prevailing levels of rent in the general locality and achieved rental values in respect of other properties of comparable accommodation and provision that would be likely to be considered by a prospective tenant.[12]The current rent, and the period that has passed since that rent was agreed or determined is not relevant. Previous changes in rent are therefore disregarded as the Tribunal is required to assess the rent that would be offered by a prospective tenant who has no knowledge of the existing or previous rents. Similarly, historic rents achieved elsewhere are of limited relevance.[13]The legislation requires the Tribunal to have regard to market demand assuming that the landlord is willing. The Tribunal is therefore unable to have any regard to the personal circumstances or identities of the actual landlord and tenant in assessing the level of rent.[14]It is therefore irrelevant whether or not the Landlord requires the rent to be at a certain level to fund its liabilities and/or its repair obligations under the lease or whether the Tenant feels that the services provided by the Landlord are “value for money.” As such, the cost of mortgage payments and property maintenance to the Landlord does not affect the rent that would be offered by a prospective tenant in the market and must be disregarded.[15]Similarly, the ability, or otherwise, of the Tenant to pay the rent demanded cannot be taken into account and the Tribunal must disregard the Tenant’s personal circumstances as the Property is assumed to be “vacant and to let.”[16]Furthermore, the valuation exercise assumes a hypothetical tenant who does not have the benefit of any knowledge obtained from being in occupation of the Property.[17]In this regard, whilst the valuation exercise assumes that, regardless as to the condition of the Property, a hypothetical tenant would be prepared to take occupation and negotiate a rent, it does not follow that the actual Tenant and the hypothetical tenant are one and the same. As such, the actual Tenant may be 3 prepared to pay a certain level of rent to remain in occupation for personal reasons whereas the hypothetical tenant is bidding on the assumption that the Property is vacant and to let.[18]Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property would be in the order of £2,050 pcm. Decision[12]Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £2,050 per calendar month with effect from 1 December 2025. APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal. 4