Middle Cottage Robin Hood Whatstandwell Matlock Derbyshire DE4 5HF BIR/17UF/MNR/2024/0132
REASONS
[1]On 6th May 2024, the Applicant (tenant of the above property) referred to the Tribunal, a notice of increase of rent served by the Respondent (landlord of the above property) under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.[2]The Respondent’s notice, which proposed a rent of £585.00 per month with effect from 1st June 2024, is dated 25th April 2024.[3]The date the tenancy commenced is stated on the Application Form as being in 1990 and is an Assured Shorthold Tenancy. The current rent is stated as being £533.00 per month. INSPECTION[4]The Tribunal inspected the property on Monday 23rd September 2024 in the presence of the Applicant. The property comprises of a single storey mid terraced bungalow of local stone construction surmounted by a pitched tiled roof. It is located in a somewhat isolated rural position with limited nearby shops and local amenities. The property is approached via a steep drive from a roadway of limited width. The drive leads to a communal parking area.[5]Although the front of the property is on the same level as the parking area, due to the slope of the site, the rear elevation is at first floor level with another unrelated dwelling underneath.[6]Briefly the accommodation comprises of entrance hall, lounge, kitchen, one double bedroom, one single bedroom and shower room with a refitted shower provided by the Respondent. The property is small with all the rooms being of a restricted size. Externally the property has a small front forecourt with timber shed provided by the Applicant. There is no rear garden and no garage. There is a shared car parking area of limited size.[7]The property has oil fired central heating and is double glazed.[8]The property was found to be in reasonable general condition although the Tribunal was of the opinion that its limited size, location and lack of outside space would not appeal to some potential tenants. EVIDENCE[9]The committee received written representations from the Applicant and the Respondent which were copied to the other party.[10]Neither party requested a hearing.[11]In its written submission the Respondent referred to the following comparables: 1) Plaistow Hall Farm Cottage, DE4 5PH – A smaller property recently let at £650.00pcm. 2) 12 Wirksworth Road, DE56 4GH – A one bedroom cottage recently let at £850.00pcm. 3) The Common, Crich, DE4 5BS – This property is currently available at £650.00pcm. 3 4) 23 Gorsey Bank, DE4 4AD – A smaller property than Middle Cottage but recently modernised. It has one bedroom and has recently been let at £760.00pcm.[12]The Respondent submitted that the open market rental was therefore £750.00pcm less 20% to allow for an Assured Tenancy. It was also submitted that tenant’s improvements could only be taken into account if they were carried out with the consent of the landlord and that neither they, or the previous landlord had given such consent since 2008.[13]It was submitted by the Applicant that he had ‘spent £20,000.00 over the time he had lived at the property. The Tribunal understands that this includes: i. Repairs to several floors and doors. ii. Some re-plastering. iii. Re-fitted the kitchen. iv. Fitted a log burning stove to the Lounge and fireplace. v. Installed central heating. vi. Laid the front patio and built the front wall.[14]The Applicant confirmed that the Respondent had fitted the UPVC double glazing and UPVC double glazed front door. The Respondent had also rewired the property several years ago.[15]The Tribunal noted that the Respondent had fitted a new walk-in shower unit and wash hand basin. THE LAW[16]In accordance with the terms of section 14 Housing Act 1988 the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.[17]In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(1), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in section 14(2) of that Act. THE TRIBUNAL’S DECISION[18]The Respondent is now proposing a rent of £585.00 per month. The Tribunal determined that an open market rent of £785.00 per month would be appropriate for the property if it was offered with the benefit of carpets, curtains and white goods but these are the property of the Applicant tenant and therefore excluded from the Tribunal’s assessment.[19]Similarly, the central heating is to be disregarded as are the other Tenant’s improvements.[20]The Respondent submits that the landlord had not given consent for the improvements carried out by the tenant. However, the Tribunal does not accept this as their knowledge only goes back to 2008, whereas the Applicant moved into the property in 1990. The Tribunal is also of the opinion that without some of the works having been completed by the tenant, the property would be uninhabitable. 4[21]The Tribunal therefore considered the various monthly deductions to reflect the work carried out by the Applicant tenant as follows: Central Heating 55.00 Refitted kitchen 35.00 New floors/door/plastering 30.00 Fireplace and stove 10.00 External/general works 30.00 Carpets, curtains and white goods 40.00 Total £200.00[22]In coming to its decision, the Tribunal had regard to the comparable provided by the Respondent and the members' own general knowledge of market rent levels in the area of Derbyshire. The Tribunal concluded that an appropriate market rent for the property would be £585.00 per month.[23]The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market would be £585.00 per month.[24]This rent will take effect from 1st June 2024, being the date of the Respondent’s notice. APPEAL[25]Any appeal against this Decision can only be made on a point of law and must be made to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Prior to making such an appeal the party appealing must apply, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal within 28 days of the date of issue of this Decision, (or, if applicable, within 28 days of any decision on a review or application to set aside) identifying the decision to which the appeal relates, stating the grounds on which that party intends to rely in the appeal, and stating the result sought by the party making the application. G S Freckelton FRICS Chairman First-tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property)