Okang, R v [2021] EWCA Crim 654
[1]appellant pleaded guilty on 9 November 2020.[2]sleep, suffering from anxiety attacks, high blood pressure and losing weight.[3]Mr Durston's business. The sole issue on this appeal is whether the sentences should have been suspended. The judge took the view that the offending was so serious that appropriate punishment could only be achieved by immediate custody. That is, of course, one of the factors indicating that it would not be appropriate to suspend a custodial sentence, as set out in the guideline on Imposition of Community and Custodial Sentences. However, it is submitted on behalf of the appellant that all three of the factors indicating that it may be appropriate to suspend a custodial sentence were present in this case.[4]while she was at work or university and supported her during her bouts of depression.[5]victims.[6]immediate custody would result in significant harmful impact upon others.[7]to impose an immediate sentence of imprisonment.[8]over £14,000 of it on goods for himself.[9]custody. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. Epiq Europe Ltd hereby certify that the above is an accurate and complete record of the proceedings or part thereof. Lower Ground, 18-22 Furnival Street, London EC4A 1JS Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Email: rcj@epiqglobal.co.uk