Jeffs, R. v [2019] EWCA Crim 1651

[2019] EWCA Crim 1651
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
CRIMINAL DIVISION
Venue Royal Courts of Justice Strand London, WC2A 2LLDate Thursday, 6 June 2019
B e f o r e:
LORD JUSTICE SIMON
MR JUSTICE LAVENDER
HIS HONOUR JUDGE EDMUNDS QC
R E G I N A v
LEWIS CLIFORD IAN JEFFS
Computer Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Epiq Europe Ltd, Lower Ground, 18-22
Furnival Street, London EC4A 1JS, Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Email: rcj@epiqglobal.co.uk (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
This transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved.
WARNING: Reporting restrictions may apply to the contents transcribed in this document, particularly if the case concerned a sexual offence or involved a child. Reporting restrictions prohibit the publication of the applicable information to the public or any section of the public, in writing, in a broadcast or by means of the internet, including social media. Anyone who receives a copy of this transcript is responsible in law for making sure that applicable restrictions are not breached. A person who breaches a reporting restriction is liable to a fine and/or imprisonment. For guidance on whether reporting restrictions apply, and to what information, ask at the court office or take legal advice.
Mr B V O'Toole appeared on behalf of the Appellant
J U D G M E N T
JeffsDefendantRCrown
[1]"If an offender is convicted of a lesser or different offence from that originally charged, and has earlier made an unequivocal indication of a guilty plea to this lesser or different offence to the prosecution and the court, the court should give the level of reduction that is appropriate to the stage in the proceedings at which this indication of plea (to the lesser or different offence) was made taking into account any other of these exceptions that apply." the appellant's guilty plea. offence. to justify a sentence of this length. In the case of the attempted burglary, it is accepted that this was a category 2 offence. The trauma caused to Mrs Castle made it a case of greater harm. The starting point for a category 2[2]custody.[3]committed in the middle of the night.[4]but, as the judge noted, the appellant did substantial damage within the property.[5]discount. That was outside the range set out in the guidelines.[6]months' imprisonment.[7]the top of the range, ie 2 years before discount, giving a sentence of 16 months.[8]sentence for multiple offending simply by adding together notional single sentences.[9]viewed in isolation.[10]months would not have been appropriate.[11]a sentence of 9 months' imprisonment. To that extent, this appeal is allowed. Epiq Europe Ltd hereby certify that the above is an accurate and complete record of the proceedings or part thereof. Lower Ground, 18-22 Furnival Street, London EC4A 1JS Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Email: rcj@epiqglobal.co.uk