"There is a provision for late submission. However, the document in question here is not one missing from a sequence. Indeed, it was not in existence at the time of the application at all, as the date upon it shows. That it could have been obtained earlier is not the issue. The Applicant did not obtain it until after the application was submitted, so it cannot be described as a document omitted by the Applicant at the time. The Applicant argues that the Respondent provided him with a opportunity post-application to supply the document and consequently that it should have been taken into account. His difficulty with that argument is that e-mail providing evidence of the request was not before the first instance judge, but in any event, the notion that providing him with an opportunity to supply a document requires the Respondent to overlook the attached fails as unsustainable."
"[The Respondent] will only consider documents that have been submitted with the application, and will only consider documents submitted after the application where they are submitted in accordance with subparagraph (b). (b)... Some of the documents in a sequence have been omitted (for example, if one bank statement from a series is missing).."
"The response to a request by an Applicant that he be permitted to forward further documents and that any documents should be sent in 7 working days is no indication that the Home Office will dis-apply the requirement that relevant documentation must be sent at the time of application. That was all the First-tier Tribunal Judge and the Upper Tribunal Judge decided and there is no error of law in that decision."