“(1) Neither the grounds of appeal nor the skeleton argument advance any important point of principle or practice sufficient to satisfy the second appeal’s test and there no compelling reason for the Court of Appeal to hear the appeal. (2) On the contrary, the judge’s decision was plainly right; he went through the three stages mandated by Denton; it was conceded, as was obvious, that the failure to comply was serious, not least because it was a breach of an unless order, and the failure took place in the face of reminders of the importance of compliance. (3) At stage two the judge considered the medical evidence and decided that it did [not] support any argument that the defendant’s medical condition contributed to the failure. There was no other explanation; he was entirely right to say that the district judge considered a number of irrelevant factors. (4) Having decided stages one and two in the way that he did, stage three almost inevitably followed. (5) Since the judge was entitled to substitute his own discretion for that of the district judge, any further appeal is an appeal against the judge’s exercise of discretion. Complaints that he attributed too much or too little weight to particular factors are quite inadequate to raise arguable grounds of appeal. (6) Quite apart from anything else, an application to set aside a judgment entered after non-compliance with an unless order must be made within 14 days of the judgment … and this application was itself seriously out of time.”