Lonergan v Gedling Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 696

Case No A2 2007/2914[2009] EWCA Civ 696
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
CHANCERY DIVISION
(MR JUSTICE LEWINSON)
Venue Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LLDate Tuesday, 9 th June 2009SIR ANDREW MORRITT CHCLORD JUSTICE KEENELORD JUSTICE ELIAS
LonerganAppellantGedling Borough CouncilRespondent
(DAR Transcript ofWordWave International LimitedA Merrill Communications Company190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AGTel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr G Blakey (instructed by Messrs Sinclairs) appeared for Appellant.Mr A Chambers (instructed by Messrs Weightmans) appeared for Respondent.Ms N Kleir (instructed by .J E Baring & Co) appeared for Interested Party.
JudgmentSir Andrew Morritt:
[1]The first application with which we have to deal is one made by Mr Blakey, who seeks to appear on behalf of Mrs Lonergan. He is an admitted solicitor, but without the benefit of High Court rights of audience. He applies to us to be permitted to appear on the hearing of this appeal on behalf of Mrs Lonergan, and he has in fact submitted an extensive written argument in support of her appeal. He frankly admitted to us that he had not made any application specifically for the purpose of getting pro bono support from the Bar Council Pro Bono Unit run in conjunction with the Chancery Bar Association; nor had he made any prior application to this court to clarify his status before the appeal was properly called on. A telephone call to my clerk is clearly not adequate for that purpose. In the circumstances, he has effectively presented the court with a pistol to the head, either to give him rights of audience or the appeal might have to go off, or go off partially.[2]I do not in those circumstances think that it would be appropriate to grant him rights of audience to appear on behalf of Mrs Lonergan. It seems to me that he is the author of her misfortune, and there is no justification for conferring on him rights of audience which he does not have.[3]I would therefore refuse to confer rights of audience on him.

Lord Justice Keene:

[4]I agree with everything which my Lord has said.

Lord Justice Elias:

[5]So do I.

Order

Application adjourned & application for rights of audience refused