ALLIED DUNBAR ASSURANCE PLC v CHRISTINE JULIE IRELAND [2001] EWCA Civ 1129
[1]LORD JUSTICE HENRY Here we have an appeal against a summary judgment given in a case where the allegation is fraud. Such an allegation must be proved to a high standard and there must be a clear, plain case, particularly where (as here) the litigant accused of fraud has filed an affidavit categorically denying the fraud.[2]This may, when it is tried, prove to be a clear and plain case, but we cannot be satisfied on the material before us. We think there are too many loose ends, too many gaps in the evidence and no sufficiently detailed evidence of when the next day's price was either obtainable or obtained by Miss Ireland.[3]Accordingly, for those reasons we will allow the appeal.Order
appeal allowed and judgment set aside; case to be tried by someone other than Judge Weeks QC; appellant to have the costs of the appeal, and the costs of the Part 24 application to be reserved to the trial judge; freezing order to continue until the end of the appeal; the police to preserve the appellant's computer and its software, the respondent's fax machines and the Saladin equipment for joint access of the parties, with liberty to the police to apply to this court on seven days' notice. [DOES NOT FORM PART OF APPROVED JUDGMENT]
Cited in 1 later judgment