L Wedderburn v Spud Shack Matcha Man Ltd: 8002720/2025
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under the provisions of rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that it has not been actively pursued.REASONS
[1]On 18 December 2025 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant seeking further specification of the claim with a view to issuing a judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 as the respondent had not provided a response to the claim.[2]The claimant replied on 31 December 2025 with a number of screenshot images in an attempt to evidence the claim but did not provide a breakdown of the sums claimed and how such were calculated.[3]On 12 January 2026 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant asking them to provide additional information. No reply was received from the claimant.[4]On 22 January 2026 and 06 February 2026, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant reminding them to reply to our earlier correspondence. No reply was received from the claimant.[5]On 17 February 2026 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 3 March 2026 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that it has not been actively pursued. No reply was received from the claimant.[6]The claim is therefore struck out under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.