Mr R McDermott v C D Leisure (Glasgow) Ltd: 8000583/2025
JUDGMENT
The remaining part of the claim, namely the complaint of unfair dismissal, is struck out under the provisions of rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that it is has no reasonable prospect of success.REASONS
[1]The claimant lacks the required qualifying service of two years to bring a claim of unfair dismissal and has not indicated in the pleadings or in subsequent correspondence that he is relying on any of the exceptions to that requirement.[2]On 15 April 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 28 April 2025 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that it is has no reasonable prospect of success. No reply was received from the claimant.[3]The remaining part of the claim, namely the complaint of unfair dismissal, is therefore struck out under rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. Date sent to parties 15 April 2025 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8000583/2025 Employment Judge P O’Donnell Mr Ryan McDermott Claimant C D Leisure (Glasgow) Ltd Respondent[1]The claimant lacks the required qualifying service of two years to bring a claim of unfair dismissal and has not indicated in the pleadings or in subsequent correspondence that he is relying on any of the exceptions to that requirement.[2]On 15 April 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by 28 April 2025 or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that it is has no reasonable prospect of success. No reply was received from the claimant.[3]The remaining part of the claim, namely the complaint of unfair dismissal, is therefore struck out under rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. Date sent to parties 09 May 2025