Mr J Kleszyk v BEN Paisley Ltd: 8000256/2025
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under the provisions of rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the basis that it has not been actively pursued.REASONS
[1]The respondent company has been dissolved. The claimant was notified by letter dated 18 March 2025 of the need to have the company restored to the Register of Companies House for the claim to proceed. The case was sisted for a period of 6 months.[2]On 22 September 2025 the Tribunal wrote to the claimant and asked for confirmation that that had taken action to have the Company restored to the Register. No reply was received. A reminder was issued on 8 October 2025, no reply was received. A further reminder was sent on 21 October 2025, no reply was received.[3]On 5 November 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give reasons why the claim should not be struck out as it had not been actively pursued with a reply by date of 19 November 2025. The time limit for so doing has passed and the claimant has failed to respond.[4]The claim is therefore struck out under the provisions of rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it has not been actively pursued.