Mr L Remenyi v Amazon UK: 8000038/2022
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).REASONS
[1]The claimant’s claim form did not include any particulars of complaint. It made reference to an attachment which could not be opened by the administration. The claimant was asked by letter dated 30 August to provide details of his complaint by 6 September. He did not respond. The claimant was then asked by letter dated 9 September to provide details of his complaint by 14 September. He did not respond. By letter dated 16 September he was required to provide details of his complaint by return. Again, there was no response from the claimant to this correspondence.[2]On 17th of October the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons by the 24th of October or to request a hearing in order to consider why the claim should not be struck out.[3]A preliminary hearing for the purposes of case management took place on 19th October by telephone conference call. The claimant did not attend that hearing.[4]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore strikes out the claim.