Ms G Saciotti v Hooky St Coffee Co Ltd: 6033315/2025

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

Case No 6033315/2025

Between

Ms Grazia SaciottiClaimant

Hooky St Coffee Co LimitedRespondent

Before

Employment Judge Beyzade

In person for claimant

Not represented for respondent

Date 24 June 2026

JUDGMENT

[1]The Tribunal decided to proceed in the absence of the respondent pursuant to Rule 47 of the Rules contained in The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (as amended), having considered the case file, the information available to it, and having made such enquiries as were practicable as to the reasons for the respondent’s absence.

[2]The claimant’s complaint for unauthorised deductions from wages (wages arrears) in relation to the period between 31 May 2025 and 09 September 2025 succeeds and the respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND NINE POUNDS AND NINETY THREE PENCE (£3109.93) subject to any required deductions for tax and national insurance provided that the respondent remits any such amount to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and accounts to the claimant for any such payment.

[3]The claimant’s complaint of breach of contract (notice pay) succeeds and the respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND FORTY-SIX POUNDS - 1 - Case Number: 6033315/2025 (£2946.00) subject to any required deductions for tax and national insurance provided that the respondent remits any such amount to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and accounts to the claimant for any such payment.

[4]The claimant’s complaint that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment contrary to s 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and s 38 of the Employment Act 2002 succeeds and the claimant is awarded the sum of TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND FIFTY-FIVE POUNDS (£2,455.00) in respect of the same.

[5]The claimant’s complaints relating to the respondent’s breach of the Taxes Management Act 1970 and HMRC Regulations by failing to issue a Form P45 having been withdrawn by the claimant, are dismissed under Rule 51 of the Rules contained in The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 (as amended).

[6]The claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal (constructive) stands dismissed. The claimant had not been continuously employed by the respondent for a period of not less than two years ending with the effective date of termination as required pursuant to s 108(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant does not have title to present and the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to consider the claimant’s unfair dismissal (constructive) complaint. Approved by: