A Patel v Hazeldene Medical Center Ltd: 6023480/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 6023480/2024
A PatelClaimantHazeldene Medical Center LtdRespondent
Employment Judge TaftRepresented herself for claimantIn person for claimantDate 23 April 2026

JUDGMENT

[1]The respondent’s application to strike out the claim is dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Taft 30 March 2026 Judgment sent to the parties on: 23 April 2026 For the Tribunal: Notes Summary Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Those reasons may be summary reasons or full written Case Number: 6023480/24 2 reasons. If full written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any full written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found at www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislationpractice- directions/[2]Case Number: 6023480/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs Arti Patel Respondent: Hazeldene Medical Center Ltd Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal (initially by CVP but later in person) On: 13,14 April 2026 Before: Employment Judge Alliott Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Ms Yemah Barlay (consultant)[4]The judgment of the tribunal is that: 1. The claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal (constructive) and for notice pay are dismissed. Approved by: