Mrs N Mulla v Dr K Hamid and Dr S Hamid: 6019731/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 6019731/2024
Mrs N MullaClaimantDr K HamidRespondent
Employment Judge BrainMr Y Lunat (instructed by solicitor) for claimantDr K Hamid for respondentDate 18 September 2025

JUDGMENT

[1]The claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal brought pursuant to the Employment Rights Act 1996 are dismissed following their withdrawal.[2]The first respondent’s application that the claim be struck out because the claimant has failed to comply with the requirements of section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 is refused, the claimant having obtained a valid early conciliation certificate naming his as respondent.[3]The claimant’s claim brought pursuant to the Equality Act 2010 cannot be said to have no reasonable prospect of success. The respondents’ application brought pursuant to rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 that it be struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success is refused.[4]The respondents’ application that New Brooklyn Dental Care should not be shown as a respondent to the claim succeeds. New Brooklyn Dental Care is not a separate legal entity. The claim against New Brooklyn Dental Care is therefore a nullity. Case Number: 6019731/2024 Approved by